Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />% <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION ^ffiETING HELD ON JULY 24,. 1978 <br />PAGE 3 I <br />Alan Olson stated that his recommendation would <br />to Increase the one-acre lot to two acres <br />minimum for unsewered property either by reducing <br />an adjacent lot or by omitting one lot. <br />Hannah moved to approve the subdivision as <br />submitted, subject to the following: pa}nnent <br />of park dedication fee. private road with <br />easement to the City, dedication of Watertown <br />right-of-way, drainage easement over the creek, <br />typical drainage and utility easements, variance <br />for Lot 2, Block 1, providing approved septic <br />system repairs can be made within this lot <br />(Including primary and alternate site), and that <br />notice be given that existing farm buildings <br />are to be used only for approved residential <br />accessory building uses. Motion seconded by <br />Hanmerel. Vote: Ayes (5), Nays (2), Motion <br />passed. <br />GRAYDON MCCULLEY <br />4605 Watertown Rd. <br />SUBDIVISION <br />PUBLIC INFO. MTG. <br />(#408) <br />Cont. <br />L * 4 <br />;'-v <br />■.m <br />(Frahm and Wilson felt that no hardship was shown <br />for the lot area variance when so much adjacent <br />land Is available especially when conqpounded by <br />existing septic system problems.) <br />Mr, Proegler was present. No public in attendance. <br />Discussion was regarding encroaching on the drip <br />line of trees. Hurr felt that the proposed location <br />would possibly encroach upon the neighbor's trees. <br />Frahm also questioned having two garages (both with <br />variances) on the property. Mr. Proegler <br />felt that he would lose his grape vines as well as <br />storage space and therefore wanted to keep the <br />existing garage. A tum-aroimd area has been <br />provided as a safety factor. <br />JOHN PROEGLER <br />2208 Shadywood Rd. <br />VARIANCE <br />(#407) <br />Wilson moved to approve this variance as requested, <br />15 ft. front setback and 3 ft. side setback, on the <br />finding that the proposed variance Is consistent <br />'^l-th the general use of the area and the hardship <br />being the encroaching of the drip line of the trees. <br />Hammerel seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes (6), <br />(!)• Notion passed. <br />(Hurr objected to a 70X variance to side yard setback <br />allowed on both sides - Infringement on both neighbors.)