Laserfiche WebLink
IL <br />MINUTES OF A PTJ^NNING COMl«lISSION MEETING HELD MAY 8, 1978 - PAGE 2 <br />2. <br />This detailed information includes: <br />1. Soil tests indicating adequate capability for <br />waste disposal. <br />Revised plan should show exact dimensions of <br />lots and Include location of present structures <br />and their distance from the lot line. <br />The private road should be indicated as an <br />outlot. <br />An easement over that road (50' width) should <br />be granted for future use of the City <br />This project should be subject to the Park <br />Dedication Fee. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />There was concern regarding the location of the road <br />and its relationship to the marsh area. Prior to <br />final approval it will be required that the applicant <br />make a firm presentation of how the road will be <br />constructed and not interfere with the character of <br />the marsh. Approval is contingent upon acceptable <br />resolution of the marsh area questions. <br />Jim Olson also stated that a topographic drainage <br />plan with contours will be required. <br />Tom Frahm seconded the motion. Unanimously approved. <br />Applicant John Swanson was present at the meeting. <br />He is applying for a conditional use permit to <br />construct two additional living quarters as guest <br />houses. At the last meeting the Planning Commission <br />recommended that the applicant bring in new plans <br />showing an addition rather than two additional <br />units. Applicant presented plans showing an <br />addition to the existing house without separate <br />kitchen facilities or entrances. Planning <br />Commission reviewed the plans and addressed whether <br />variances were required for the proposed addition. <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />LLOYD KELLEY <br />SUBDIVISION <br />85 South Brown Rd. <br />(#372 Continued) <br />JOHN SWANSON <br />2785 Casco Point Rd, <br />CONDITIONAL USE <br />(#377) <br />Gregg Hannah made the following motion: That it <br />be approved based on the fact that this is an <br />addition to a single family dwelling and that the <br />variance is required because 80% of the lot width <br />requirement is met and because the new downstairs <br />walkout addition will continue the house line which <br />is 9' from the lot line. Motion seconded by Hammerel. <br />Motion carried. <br />i