12-09-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

5. 6. 7. and reconunended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The proposed residence is set further from the lake than the old residence B. C. The lot and adjacent lots are heavily wooded. The proposed residence and lakeside pool will not obscure neighboring properties views. D.The proposed residence meets hardcover, lot coverage by structures and height requirements. E.The sewer line prohibits the proposed residence from being located further back on the property (towards the road). The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow land alteration of more than 500 cubic yards of fill to be brought onto the property willTlot to be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments Page 2 of 7 ■aw».