My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2025 12:35:47 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:56:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
StoneBty Fees <br />December 4,2002 <br />Page 4 <br />• •• <br />III. StoriaWater & Drainage Trunk Fee <br />Staff Calculation Based on Ordinance: <br />Multi-Family: 4 or fewer Units/Acre.................... $4,860.00 per acre <br />Multi-Family: Greater than 4 Units/Acre............... $5,670.00 per acre <br />Commercial:.................................................... $6,480.00 per acre <br />*. r, Residential Portion: 41.55 acres @ 6 units/acre = 41.55 x S5.670 $235,600 <br />Commercial Portion: 9.90 acres x $6.480.00/acre = $64,152 <br />Developers Proposal; <br />1. Base the fee on dry buildable acreage only: <br />Residential Portion: 27.72 acres x S5670 = $157,172 <br />Commercial Portion: 8.75 acres x $6480 = $56,700 <br />2. Grant credit of $15,100 plus 12% design cost for oversizing of watermain <br />3. Grant credit of SI 17,160 plus 12% design cost for entire construction cost of regional <br />stormwater pond. <br />4. Grant credit of $17,740 plu' 12% design cost for incremental cost/benefit of <br />providing storm sewer to the properties to the west (2 dental office sites). <br />Total credit or reimbursement proposed by Developer: $168,000 <br />Staff Analysis and Recommendation <br />Again, developers suggest that the fee should be based on dry buildable land acreage. However as <br />noted m the recent staff memo and code amendment regarding the S W«S:DT Fee for 2-acre and 5-a'cre <br />zones, the original ordinance established a fee structure based on the entire acreage of the various <br />zones of the City and did not exclude wetlands from the calculation method. Fee should he h;,.^d <br />on entire acreage. ----- ------------ <br />* <br />Developer is requestingcreditsforS16,9I2for provision of excess capacity in water line^e City <br />^^uired to be 12'' vs 8". This was done with the Willow View project and is a reasonable <br />Developerisrequestingcreditfor$131,219forconstructionoftheregionalpond. StafTwouldnntv <br />SUBP9rt a p^rttjil pry^it, based on the difference between the cost of a pond with capacity needed to <br />serve just the Stonebay and associated commercial development, and the cost of the regional pond <br />Developer would be required to calculate this cost differential and City Engineer would verify. <br />Developer also requests credit for construction of storm sewer facilities constructed to serve the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.