My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
12-08-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:46:27 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:17:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 20,2003 <br />6:00 o’clock pin. <br />asked what record the City has of the previous deck size. <br />While he felt that he probably would not have allowed it, Rahn stated that it was not out of <br />character of what is currently in the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Standa sUted that the deck has alwav^ been on the structure. <br />Gaffron agreed that, to everyone’s knowledge, the deck had always been there. He noted <br />that research could be done to find the original paperwork. <br />Rahn maintained that the cantilevered portion was new, and asked the applicant consider a <br />straight replacement, without the cantilever, and minimum landing. <br />Mr. Standa stated that he would like a deck to allow for safe exit from the sliding doors <br />that have always been there as well. <br />There was no public comment. <br />Fritzler suggested the applicant remove the sliding doors and replace them with a solid <br />window. <br />Mabusth stated that she believed the applicant should be allowed some kind of access <br />platform out of the doors, for safety sake, adding that a second exit is beneficial. <br />Rahn noted that two accesses are not mandatory. <br />In light of the removals, Mabusth stated that she felt a 4' platform was a fair compromise. <br />Hawn questioned whether the deck and or structure could be moved further than 1 ’ from <br />the property line. <br />Page 7 of 41 <br />\ <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.