Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 20,2003 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Gafifron indicated that the discussion had not pursued that far, since it was the applicant’s <br />intent to keep what he had. <br />Mr. Standa volunteered to make additional removals of hardcover on the property, <br />including the concrete slab behind the accessory structure, sidewalk along side of the home <br />to the accessory building, and repair or removal of the crumbling lake access steps. <br />Mabusth recommended the lake access steps be replaced for safety sake, since the lot is a <br />steep lake lot. <br />Mr. Standa pointed out that the retaining walls would also be in need of repair in the near <br />future. <br />Hawn questioned the necessity of the fire pit and flagpole. <br />Mr. Standa indicated that he would prefer to keep both his flagpole and fire pit; however, if <br />it was mandated he could remove the fire pit. <br />Mabusth questioned whether the LMCD would have an issue with the structure protruding <br />over the water. <br />Gaffron stated that the LMCD may want to look at it if the posts are at or below the <br />OHWL. <br />If this application had come before the Commission before the fact, Mabusth asked the <br />Commission what they would have allowed. She noted that she would have asked for the <br />removal of the slab. <br />Hawn questioned whether they would have approved a deck on an accessory structure, and <br />an even bigger deck than previously attached to this nonconforming structure. She asked <br />whether it was the Commission’s intent to do away with these structures altogether. Hawn <br />Page6or41 <br />i <br />iMft)