Laserfiche WebLink
«H)3-2936 <br />August 18,2003 <br />Page 2 of8 <br />D - Existing Survey <br />E - Proposed Survey <br />F - Proposed Elevations and Floor Plans <br />G - Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />H - Letter dated August 12,2003 from City Engineer, Tom Kellogg <br />1 - Photographs <br />J - Property 0\M.>*rs List <br />K - Plat Map <br />Background <br />The applicant originally applied for a variance to remodel the existing home and allow an <br />existing, non-conforming 8’ setback in the southwestern comer of the home to remain to <br />try and save an existing larf' maple tree. After reviewing the plans and conversations <br />with the architect it became apparent that the majority of the existing home was to be <br />demolished to accommodate the renovations, and if the true intention was to save the tree <br />the home should be shifted north. Because of this staff directed the applicant that the <br />project would be reviewed as a rebuild and that the home should be shifted to meet the <br />10 ’ setback requirement. The applicant agreed to this and submitted new plans applying <br />for a lot area and lot width variance. <br />Upon further examination of the plans it was discovered that the new home would meet <br />the hardcover requirements in the 75-250 ’ zone but the 0-75 ’and 250-500 ’ zones, as they <br />currently exist, are over on hardcover. Due to the rebuild, the whole lot is reviewed for <br />hardcover compliance and has required the applicant to now apply for hardcover <br />variances. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />Lot AreaAVidth; <br />LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21,780 s.f. ('/i acre)100’ <br />Actual 21,392 s.f. (.49 acres)60 ’ 1 <br />............. —i <br />Setbacks: <br />LR-IC Required Existing Proposed <br />Front 30 ’n/a n/a <br />^ J ' 1 <br />Rear 30 ’51’ (garage) <br />120 ’(house) <br />31’(garage) <br />94 ’(house) <br />fiuriii J