Laserfiche WebLink
MIMTF.SOI lili: <br />tMCONO Pl.ANMNC COMMISSION M» KTINO <br />>loaday. Orlobcr m. 2004 <br />6:00 o’clork p.m. <br />(N04*305S Dr. Manka Spcaccr, t'aallaiifdl <br />SuitrccomiiMmiling dcnul of tlic vatuiucs icquc>tril a% ihae is no h4i*l%hip picscnl to Mippoil <br />ihc request <br />Ritter stated tliere are ^adc changes in the real ol tlic yaid tliat tlKy are aticniplmg to accoiiitiHKlaie in <br />order to allow the property owner access to her rear yaid. Ritter stated the pro|Hrrty is located on a <br />sw’amp, which makes the property almost unusable during the suinniertiine due to the mowjuit»ics <br />Ritter staled they arc attempting to make the hack yard I'unctioiul and usable <br />Rahn noted the pnifietly owner is allowed a pathway on a dewendmg shi|v to ilie wetland Rahn <br />inquired why one of tlie decks could not he scieeiied in <br />Spencer pointed out if the deck was scrcciKd in. it would olisliuet her vicss from the h mse and cut <br />down on the amount of light that is allowed in. <br />Rahn stated according to the elesations, it appears the roof of tlte ga/cbo wmild he at alHMit e\e level. <br />Ritter pointed out the law requiring a 150-f«M>i setback was not pul into effect until with Mrs. <br />SpctKcr residing in this properly for 20 years. <br />Iliere wac no public cummenis cuncrmiiig this a|tplicalion <br />Kempf staled he has loured this pro|K*r1y and also fell the deck could he sciceiicd m. Kciiipf stated iw <br />underslaikls that does limit the light into llie residence sotiKwhat. but ilut the afiplicant iiuisl nuke a <br />choice on what type of hardcover she would like m order tu help |iruiecl Trench I ake. <br />Ritter reiterated that that law was not implemented until IW4. w ith Ins client residing in that lesuirnce <br />fur ten years prior to ilial. <br />Curtis slated the 1094 law that Mr. Ritter is discussing is the adiiplion of the SlkNclaiid (Ivcilay <br />Ordinance that identified FreiKh fjke as a nalurai cnsiioiimeiil lake ic.|uinng a IM) loot scilui k <br />('urlis suicd the amount of allow able haidcover in the 0-73’ setback /one was not changed at llul lime <br />and has icnuincd llte same since the laic I97()'s. <br />Jurgens noted there currently is a variaiKC for Ihc harikuvcr on the propcity <br />Spcnca pointed out that the cjusting hatdeover is less than what had existed |ireviously on llie <br />property. <br />Jurgens inquired whether the applicant would be willing to trade a deck for a ga/cbo Jurgens stated <br />the applicant is allowed a certain amount of hardcover but that he would not be in favor u| iiKieasing <br />the hardcover that currently exists on the properly siikc lime iloes nut appear to lie a hardship <br />PAGE 17