My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:26:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMSIlSSION MEETING <br />Moaday, October IS, 2(MM <br />6:00 o'clock pjn. <br />(MM*30S5 Dr. Martha Spcaccr, Coatiaued) <br />Winkey questioned *hy the gazebo was not pan of the onginal plan. <br />Spencer stated the gazebo w as pan of the original plan. <br />Ritter stated the plan for the gazebo for some reason w as never submitted to the Cit> and only the deck <br />was approN-ed. <br />Cunii stated at the time of the preuous application there was a phone conversation between the <br />applicant and staff concerning the gazebo but that no information w as ever supplied to the City dunng <br />the original application <br />Rahn pointed out one of the conditions for the hardcover v'ariance was tliat the hardcoscr in the 0-75* <br />setback zone shall not be increased above S percent. <br />Curtis indicated the gazebo w as discussed at the time of the application for the decks but that no <br />information was ever supplied to tlie City. <br />Bremer inquired whether any hardcover could be removed in the 0»75* zone. <br />Spencer suted there u a cement dog pen. <br />Jurgens noted the dog pen is not shown on the surv ey but is located closer to the shoreline <br />Spencer commented they have removed as much hardcover as possible. <br />Fritzler staled he does not see a reason to increase the liardcover in this area and would not be in favor <br />of a gazebo at this tune. <br />Ritter inquired whether the walkways would be permitteu. <br />Fritzler stated he is not in favor of the hardcover increasing. <br />Curtis inquired whether the pathways are actual steps. <br />Ritter indicated they are a combination of walkw ays and steps to enable the property owner to access <br />her back yard. Ritter noted the walkway was shown on the original plan. <br />Curtis suted the suuway as proposed is to get around in the yard and not to access the lakeshore. <br />Rahn pomted out the only hardcover that is allowed to encroach in the 0>7S* area w ould be a pathw ay <br />from the home down to the lake. <br />PAGE 18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.