Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, Jar.uary 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(MIKE KEAVENY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD M. KEAVENY REV. TRUST, 3425 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND C0>LMERC1AL SITE <br />PLAN REVIEW - Continued) <br />Austin Evans, 2497 Kelly Avenue, the nearest neighbor to the south of the bowling alley, <br />voiced numerous concerns; <br />1) As Kelly Avenue ts a residential street, he found the additional traffic <br />worrisome within a residential neighborhood. <br />2) The fact that the restaurant and lounge w ould have a liquor Lccrj^c w as a <br />concern, especially since the neighborhood is kept up at night from the commotion at the <br />Narrows currently. <br />3) He questioned whether there was adequate space for restaurant use and the <br />parking to accompany it. <br />4) The City cannot ensure how long the Pizaa Factory w ill remain, and the <br />City would lose control of wrhal type of restaurant or lounge occupies this space in the <br />future by allowing this today to go forward. <br />5) The traffic exiting onto County Road IS would make a dangerous situation <br />and intersection w orse. <br />6) Evans cautioned that relocation of the bus shelter at the junction of Kelly <br />Avenue and County Road 15 would be far more dangerous than where it is currently. <br />Encouraging pedestnans to cross 2-4 lanes of traffic between cars stacked up for the light <br />would be hazardous. <br />7) WTiat would the impact be to Lake Minnetonka from this additional <br />development merely 200 ’ from the lake. Might people try to snow mobile or obtain boat <br />access to the restaurant. <br />8) 68% of the little proposed landscaping at all is located pnmanly in the rear <br />where few see it. Ln fact, no landscape plan has been provided. Reminded of the Navarre <br />Town Meeting a year ago, dunng which residents asked for additional landscaping along <br />County Road 15 in Navarre. <br />9) The proposed parking facilities are incomplete and inadequate. While 53 <br />spaces arc required, contrary to zoning regulations, the proposal ofTcis a mere 30 spaces <br />for a 75 scat restaurant. The additional use requires 91 total spaces, shon 7 in the proposal, <br />w iih no setbacks or greenspacc provided. <br />10) This approval would increase the use of the lot to 16,(X)0 s .f of retail space, <br />w hich required by zoning should assume 1* of lot area per 4’ of retail space. Evans <br />maintained that by approving this request the City will continue to perpetuate an <br />urucceptable plaiuiing stare of affairs for Navarre. <br />11) In the Navarre Town Meeting several points were echoed by the residents. <br />Since Navarre is considered Orono’s town center, why not make it more like Wayzata or <br />Excelsior with additional landscaping, street lighting, and updating facades of the <br />businesses in the area. <br />Evans encouraged the Planning Commission to give senous consideration to denial of this <br />applicant’s request and recommend the owTiCr address alternative uses for the site. He <br />PAGE 46 of 53