01-20-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MM-2M9 jMnar> XO.UM Pagc2*ra PcrtiBcal Zoning Ordinance Sectioos See. 78-330. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be obser>cd: LMAm(«crt)Lo(Widai(fccll Ffoni Yafd (ftet)SMt Vare A4Jacrat iLAMtkfr Ul (fan) Rear Yard (fact) I Side Yard Adjacent lo ' Siren (ftci) | Sec. 78-1288. Hard cover limitations. (a) No hard cover or impervious surface shall be placed, located or constructed within 75 feet of the ordinary high water level of any lake or tributary, except for stairways, lifts, landings and lockboxes as regulated elsewhere in this Code. (b) Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL, there shall be no greater than 25 percent hard cover. Between 250 feel and 500 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 30 percent hardcover. Between 500 feet and 1.000 feet of the OHWL there shall be no greater than 35 percent hardcover. Sec. 78-282. Lakeshore hard cover and land alteration regulations. In any LR-I A. LR- IB, LR-IC or LR-IC-1 district, within 75 feet of shoreline, there shall be* no excavating, niling. hard cover, temporary or permanent structures except as permitted under section 78-28 1. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline, there shall be no greater than 25 percent hard cover. Within 250 feet to 500 feet of the shoreline, there shall be no greater than 30 percent hard cover. Within 500 feet to 1,000 feet of the shoreline, there shall be no greater than 35 percent hard cover. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application E.xhibit B - Adjacent Property Owners* Acknowledgement Forms Exhibit C - Hardship Statement Exhibit D - Existing Survey Exhibit E - Proposed Survey Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G - Aerial Photograph Exhibit H - Photographs E.xhibit I - Landscape Plan for 0-75* Zone E.xhibit J - Proposed Elevations Exhibit K - Proposed Floor Plans Exhibit L - Propertv Owners List Exhibit M - Plat Map Backgroaad The applicant has met with staff lo discuss the proposed plans. The discussions related to whether or not the proposal would be reviewed as a renovation or a rebuild. The applicant is proposing to tear the existing house down to the cap. replacing flooring as needed and keeping the wall on the south side of the house in order to reuse the fireplace. The applicant has stated the intention to reuse whatever the builder is able to. although