Laserfiche WebLink
FILE «04.30€6 <br />6 Novemcer 2C01 <br />Pjge 3 of 4 <br />Structural Coveraue: <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />22,215 s.f (0.50 acre)Allowed: <br />Proposed: <br />3,332 s.f (13%) <br />3,441 s.f (15.4%) <br />Ilarilcovvr r»Iciilulimis: <br />Hardcover <br />/one <br />0 - 75 <br />75 - 250 <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />7,610 s.f. <br />1^1,605 s.f. <br />Allowed llnrdco\er <br />Osf <br />(Oli) <br />.1,651 s.f. <br />Kxislin;' <br />Hardcover <br />989 s.f.* <br />(12.9%) <br />5,317 s.f.* <br />(36.4 %) <br />I*roposc<l <br />Hardcover <br />989 s.f. <br />(12.9%) <br />5,317 s.f <br />(36.4 %) <br />* Aficr exclusion of fabric or pla.slic-lincd landscape beds <br />Lake Setback Variance <br />I I'.c current Ironic was constructed to meet the 75' setback from the lake. The deck was <br />originally constructed to encro.rch 14’ into the lake setback. Since that time there have <br />been ,additioiis to the home and the deck. Additionally, the shoreline has eroueil <br />significantly icsulting in the home encroaching on the 75 ’ setback where it was once <br />conlorming <br />Side Yard .Setback Variance <br />Although the vvestein property line abuts .in alley, the wc.stcrn lot line of this property has <br />historically been reviewctl as a side lot line rather than a side street lot line. 1 herefore, in <br />order to reorient and raise the roof of the home aiul raise the roof of the garage to match <br />the new 2'"’ story addition, a variance to the side yard setback of 10’ is required. <br />Hardship .Statement <br />Applicant has com|)leted the Hardship Documentation i'oim attached as hxhibit B. and <br />aliould be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship .Analysis <br />In amslitcring nppth atlons /or variance, the Viannliif ’ Comnihslon shall consUer the effect of the <br />propou ’il varionee upon the health, safety anti welfare of the eononnnity, existinfi ami antieipateil traffic <br />coiuliiioits, li^hl tnut air, ttanf»t*r oj jire, risk to the ptthlic %ajct\\ atu! the ejject toi vaittes of property in <br />the surroiintiinf^ area. I he l'laiitiiii\* i 'ommiwion shall consitler reeontmenilin^ approval Jor variances <br />Jroni the literal ptovisions oj the Zoning i ode in instances tvhere their strict enforcement would cause <br />undue hardship because of circiinistaiices unique to the individual property under consideration, and <br />shall reconiniend approval only when it is denionslrated that such actions will he in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the Orono /on hi}* Code. <br />Staff linds that due to the location of the home and garage and the erosion of the <br />sluMcline there may be hardships to justily granting side setback and hike .setKick <br />variances in order for the applicants to construct additions to the existing home and <br />garage. <br />•Vs <br />M