Laserfiche WebLink
or front lot line than the principal structure. The Planning Commission stipulated the approval of the <br />lot width variance on a grading plan acceptable to staff and the City Engineer prior to City Council <br />approval. <br />Staff Recommeodation <br />Approval per the attached Resolution. <br />The grading plan that is attached as Exhibit B will be revised after printing of this report. Staff, <br />including the City Engineer and Building Inspector, held a meeting Thursday November 4'*’ to <br />discuss the proposed grading plan. At that time a workable plan was agreed upon, which the <br />applicant’s consultants have agreed to formally submit Monday, November 8*^ prior to the City <br />Council meeting. Assuming this plan meets the concepts discussed at the November 4“* meeting »o <br />the satisfaction of the City Engineer; staff recommends the resolution be adopted to approve the lot <br />width variance. If the plan is not in conformance with the concepts discussed at the meeting, staff <br />will take this proposal off the November 8‘*' meeting and final Council action will not occur until the <br />agreed upon plan is submitted. <br />The applicant’s builder was also directed to meet with as many i.cighbors as he could to discuss the <br />proposed grading and drainage plan prior to the November 8* Council meeting, as many neighbors <br />expressed drainage concerns at the Planning Commission meeting. Staff feels that the grading plan <br />discussed at the November 4“* meeting will help alleviate some existing problems while managing <br />the new stormwater created with construction of an additional home. <br />Staff continues to recommend denial of the requested variance to keep an existing accessory building <br />closer to the street or front lot line than tlie principal building. The Planning Commission and staff <br />feel that if the location of the proposed home does not allow for an accessory building being located <br />behind it, than the extra space should be incorporated into the attached garage. Further, accessory <br />buildings should only be allowed when a site lends itself to support one meeting the requirements of <br />the Zoning Ordinance. (Also, the agreed upon grading plan now required removal of the accessory <br />building.) <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Adopt the attached Resolution granting a lot width variance for 4475 Forest Lake Landing and <br />denial of the variance request to keep an existing accessory building closer to the street or front lot <br />line than the proposed principal structure.