Laserfiche WebLink
Date Application Received: 9*17-04 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 10-12-04 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 12-11-04 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />**^*'^’* ••crrTiMQ <br />NOV 8 2004 <br />CITY OF CHOINO <br />Date: November 4, 2004 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlach^P <br />Title: City Planner <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #04-3054, Jon & Gail Blackstone, 4475 Forest Lake Landing <br />Variance - Resolution <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />List of Exhibits <br />LR- IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre minimum) <br />.886 acres (38,596 s.f.) <br />110 feet (140’ required) <br />A - Resolution per Plarming Commission Recommendation <br />B — Approved Grading Plan (revised copy to be handed out at the meeting) <br />C - Revised Hardcover Calculations (conforming levels proposed) <br />D - City Engineer Memo RE: Grading dated 11-3-04 <br />E - PC Action Notice 10-19-04 <br />F - PC Memo and Exhibits of 10-15-04 <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct a <br />new residence on an existing, vacant parcel: <br />1. Lot width variance to permit a lot width at the public roadway of 110 feet when <br />140 feet is normally required. (112’ is required to meet administrative approval <br />criteria) <br />2. Variance to permit the existing accessory building to remain on the lot in a <br />location closer to the street or front lot line than the proposed house. <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends: <br />1. Approval of the lot widtli variance as a house existed in the pa.st, the lots were <br />legally formed, and the lot width would not be inconsistent with the area. <br />2. Denial of the accessory structure location variance as no hardship inherent to the <br />land exists to allow it to remain in its current location. A new accessory building <br />______could be constructed in a conforming location on the property.________________ <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />At the October 18,2004 meeting the Plarming Commission voted 7-0 for approval of the lot width <br />variance and denial of the variance to permit an accessory building to be located nearer to the street <br />I <br />I