05-10-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M t /; #04-3003 April t9,2004 Page 4 of6 The plan in Exhibit C also shows building pad locations in relation to the required setbacks and primary and alternate septic locations. The applicants have shown that an adequate house can be placed on these lots and staff is satisfied with the lot layouts as proposed. These lots meet all required lot standards as shown in the table above and actually far exceed the required standards. The plan in Exhibit C also shows the average lakeshore setback line. Due to the location of the existing houses on both sides of the lot, the three proposed lots will be subject to a strict average lakeshore setback. The average lakeshore setback ranges from over 400 ’ on proposed lot 1 to 135 ’ on proposed lot 3. The building pad locations have been determined in relation to this setback line. Staff recommends that this line be adopted as the average setback for ail 3 lots and that the issue of which home gets built first will not affect the average setback for the rest. City Engineer Tom Kellogg has not submitted written comments regarding the proposed plans at this time. The City Engineer has been in contact with the surveyor regarding the methods of rate control of stormwater pre and post development and the methods the applicants are proposing to collect stormwater horn the site and ha.<; preliminarily approved the concept. However, the applicant will be required to meet all recommendations of the City Engineer prior to City Council review. Required Easements The applicant must dedicate the following easements: - Conservation and Flowage Easements over all delineated wetlands. - Drainage Easements over all proposed storm water ponds and stormwater collection areas (including the dry ponds proposed). - Standard drainage and utility easements around all lot boundaries. This consists of 10 ’ around the plat boundary lot lines and 5’ on the interior lot lines. Storm Water, Drainage, and Erosion Control The applicant is proposing a dry pond with a small berm and draintile approximately 80 feet from the lake on both interior lot lines. All lots will meet the required 2.0 acres of dry with these collection areas. All storm water will be routed to these areas through the method of swale construction along the property lines. The neighbor to the east submitted a letter expressing concerns regarding drainage (see Exhibit K). Also, attached are per and post drainage area maps showing the distribution of stormwater (Exhibit D). The City Engineer has not submitted written comments regarding the storm water and drainage plan at this time however, the applicant will be required to implement all recommendations of the City . ngineer prior to City Council review. The applicant has also proposed temporary and permanent erosion control measures which must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. At a minimum, silt fence will be required. The subdivision is subject to the Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee established by ♦ • •* 1 »’ J 3 f 1