Laserfiche WebLink
Date Applicatioa Received: 12>17>03 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 12>17>03 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 2-15-04 extended to 4-15-04 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: March 5,2004 <br />Item No.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlachy^ <br />Title: City Planner <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #04-2973, Minnetonka Custom Homes, 4753 North Shore Drive, <br />Conditional Use Permit - Resolution <br />2^ning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR - IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre minimum) <br />0.173 acres (7,550 s.f.) <br />50 feet <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Memo dated 3-5-04 from Building Inspector Bruce Vang <br />B - Revised Plan <br />C - PC Action Notice 1-22-04 <br />D - PC Memo and Exhibits of 1-14-03 <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following in conjunction with a previously <br />approved project: <br />1. Conditional use permit to allow retaining walls to be constructed within 5’ of the property <br />line. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />This request was heard before the Planning Commission at their January 20,2004 meeting. The <br />applicants were requesting an after-the-fact hardcover variance and also a conditional use permit to <br />allow retaining walls and fill xvithin 5 feet of the property line. The City Engineer visited the site <br />with City Building Inspector Bruce Vang and submitted comments regarding the requests (attached <br />as Exhibit D of the planning report). The Planning Commission instructed the applicant to work <br />with staff on a plan which incorporates the comments from the City Engineer for approval by the <br />City Council. <br />The applicants have submitted a revised plan attached as Exhibit C. The new plan no longer requires <br />an after-the-fact hardcover variance; however the applicant ’s are still requesting a conditional use <br />permit to allow a retaining wall within 5 feet of the property boundary. The revised plan shows the