My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:54:44 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 3:25:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ivAAi^ u 1 CO ur 1 nc <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8,2004 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />City Council meeting. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. <br />*^^^2976 JAMES AND JUDITH PIERPONT, 1801 WEST FARM R <br />C^^mONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. <br />Gaffron that the C <br />explore ways tMjow die lot <br />allow retention of mH^hen, <br />staffs opinion that the^jeta <br />• •• <br />Gaffiron offered three options for c <br />1} Approve the plumbing in <br />any other kitchen fiuilities, require s <br />2) Approve the plunibing in accessc <br />facilities, and allow the kitchen sink to <br />> i <br />Gaffron ex9Btf d that the Council tabled this item on February 9, 2004 ajj^^frected staff to <br />explore ways tdVj^ the kitchen to remain. Gaffron stated that the priiiu|flnsue of whedier to <br />allow retention of msitchen, or even just the sink, will be allowed. H^^Rtained diat it has been <br />staffs opinion that the^j^ee of the Idtchen is what functionidU^Perentiates a ‘guest house’ <br />from an 'accessory buildn^fddi plumbing ’, and is what giyg^le guest house the ability to <br />function as a dwelling. <br />removing its supportive plumbing, reau Standard cl nant execution. <br />3) Table the application V^the Planning Gl ussion to make a recommendation <br />regarding a potential code ame nt and clarification diafM dd clearly establish CUP standards <br />for various levels of use, ba^ e applicants’ intended levc Bf use rather than on die extent of <br />facilities provided. <br />and require removal of kitchen sink and <br />execution. <br />ng CUP and require removal of all kitchen <br />ly u a basin, not as a source of water, by <br />Ga^on leminded tfafllouncil that the Code does little to distinguish be <br />versus the perma^Rcaretaker facility. He noted that the differentiation <br />or total use as^Phile distinguishing guest houses. <br />MurphvM^sd how much tune and effort had been devoted to this particular issue. <br />in pointed out that the Planning Commission has discussed this issue over the past 2- <br />found reasonable use would be to allow plumbing for a baduoom for cleaning up, but not' <br />’residence. <br />the occasional guest <br />between minimal <br />PAGE 12 of 23 <br />!1 f <br />N
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.