Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />3 <br />Maxwell Bay Esutes <br />EAW Need Determination <br />March 8,2004 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />3-2-04 letter from the petitioner stating their withdrawal of the EAW petition <br />1-24-04 letter (revised) from the applicants confirming their withdrawal of the 6 <br />lot proposal <br />Background <br />The City received an EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) Petition for project #03-2964. <br />The project consisted of a 6 lot subdivision of the prope*ly located at 3250 Fox Street with a private <br />roadway. The proposal included septic locations and met all requirements of the 2-acre zoning <br />district. The project received preliminary approval at the November 17,2003 Planning Commission <br />meeting contingent on engineering approval. <br />Since that time the neighbor ’s have hired representation and have submitted a petition to the <br />Environmental Quality Board (EQB) requesting that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />(EAW) be conducted. The purpose of an EAW is to determine if there is the potential for significant <br />environmental impacts and how to address those impacts. A brief report of potential environmental <br />issues was conducted by the petitioner and included with the petition. The City will respond briefiy <br />to these issues later in this report. <br />Having gotten resistance from the neighborhood, the applicants have since decided to withdraw their <br />request to subdivide the property into 6 lots and are now proposing 3 lakeshore lots and no roadway. <br />With withdrav .il of the 6 lot proposal, the petitioners have submitted to the City a letter withdrawing <br />their request for an EAW, Because of this the City has the option to not respond to the EAW request <br />since it has been formally withdrawn, however, the petition remains active for one year during which <br />the City could be asked to act on it. Therefore, staff has concluded that the City should respond to <br />the petition so that it can be formally closed. The EQB has advised the City that this would be the <br />best course of action due to the fact that the property will not remain vacant for the year that the <br />petition is active, and this course of action allows the applicants to pursue the 3 lot proposal. <br />Determining the Need for an EAW <br />Step 1: Determine whether the project falls into a Mandatory or Exempt EAW category under <br />EQB rules. <br />Step 2:If EAW is mandatory, EAW is required; or <br />If exempt from EAW. EAW is prohibited; or <br />If neither mandatory nor exempt, the City has the option of requiring an EAW under <br />the following guidelines: <br />A) If evidence provided by petitioners, proposers and others demonstrates to <br />the Council that the project may have the potential for significant <br />environmental effects, then Council shall require an EAW. <br />B) If evidence provided by petitioners, proposers and others fails to <br />demonstrate to the Council that the project may have the potential for <br />significant enviroiunental • ffects, then Council shall deny the petition. <br />Step 3:A Resolution incorporating Findings of Fact regarding the Council ’s decision should <br />be adopted, and this will be forwarded to the petitioner and the EQB within 5 days of <br />the decision. <br />J