My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:28:38 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:13:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF!MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINO <br />Monday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Summers stated that the driveway outlet was of great concern to him, since the driveway would run <br />the entire length of his property. <br />Although one option might include moving the driveway further west by widening the driveway, <br />Oaffron noted that widening too much would impact the septic sites and house size. <br />Koehler pointed out that drainage issues might also be a concern for the future homeowner as die <br />nmofif tends to move towards this site and under Watertown Road via % culvert. <br />Oaffron thanked the neighbor for his concern, and acknowledged that die City Engineer would <br />need to evaluate the drainage issues, and how these might impact constroction. He mentioned that <br />some buffers would be likely to maruge treatment near the creek, and noted diat die applicant <br />hopes to have these issues resolved by the February meeting. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth questioned how the applicant would plan to erois the creek. <br />While the City would need confirmation from the MCWD, Gaffeon stated that a 48*' oval culvert <br />with fill on either side wu proposed to accommodate flow. He noted that MCWD may even take <br />the position that the applicant can't build over the creek bed. <br />Henderson stated fiiat, having spoken with the MCWD, he had been led to believe dut they would <br />accept fiiis proposal. <br />While Acting Chair Mabusth stated that she would find it difficult to require additional park <br />dedication fees and stormwater trunk fees being charged to the applicant, she would defer diis to <br />the legal departmeat <br />Hawn concurred. <br />Acting Chair Mabusth moved, Bremer seconded, to table Application #04-2971, William and <br />Roilyn Hendoson,/Hlckory Fine Hornet, 3220-3240 Watertown Road, a proposed <br />Preliminary Subdlviiion and Lot Line Re-Flat pending receipt and City Engineer review of <br />PAGE 30 of 64 <br />•'-CTiiai ii<in A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.