My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:28:38 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:13:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />requested driveway and creek crossing plans. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#12) #04-2972 ROBERT KNUTH AND MARY THOMPSON, 2700 WHITE OAK CIRCLE. <br />VARIANCE (8:43-8:33 P.M.) <br />Robert Knuth, the Appiicant, was present <br />Curtis exp'ained that the applicants are requesting a front yard setback variance and a side street <br />(right-of-way) variance to aliow a porch with pergola 4S.1’ from the front lot line where a 50 ’ <br />setback is required and 35* from the street right-of-way where SO* is required and a 40 ’ setback <br />exists currently. Curtis pointed out that the applicants home is situated nearly at the front yard <br />setback line of this expansive 2.1 acre property. In order to avoid encroaching the approved <br />alternate septic system soil treatment site when the home was first built in 1978, the home was <br />constructed 56.1’ from the front property line, S’ from the required 50* setback. Along the western <br />property boundary between 2700 and 2715 White Oak Circle a continuation of the road right-of- <br />way exists. This right-of-way is currently and indefinitely not rued as a traveled road, and is open <br />space. The home is currently located 40* from this street side yard where a SO’ setback is required. <br />Due to the angle of the home on die lot, the proposed porch addition would extend 5 additional feet <br />into the required side street yard. <br />Curtis pointed out that the property is located on a cul-de-sac and die property owners wish to <br />create a "neighborly feel” to their home with the addition of the covered front porch. Due to the <br />close proximity to the front yard setback, any modification greater than S’ off the ^nt of the home <br />requires a variance to front yard setback requirement. <br />Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the 5* front yard setback variance and the IS’ <br />street side setback variaiKe due to the location of the existing house with relation to die front lot <br />line with the stipulation that die covered porch shall not be enclosed. <br />Knuth stated that they wished to open up the house to the neighborhood and add a front entry feel <br />to the cunendy blank wall. He pointed out that they began speaking to neighbors about their intent <br />a year ago and gained much support for the acdoit <br />PAGE 31 of 64
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.