My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:28:38 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:13:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Cary Roller, 3280 Watertown Road, the neighbor on the west side, stated that he had a difficult <br />time seeing the building site on the back lot <br />Caffron pointed out that the buildable site was tucked in against a 4S’ setback from the west lot <br />line, between the creek setback and wetland. <br />Mark Summers, 7S Crystal Creek Road, pointed out that his home fell 60* north of Watertown <br />Road and 7S-100* west of the property and he, too, was concerned with the placement of a home <br />» <br />on lot one. <br />Steve Koehler, 35 Crystal Creek Road, questioned die site on the hill, claiming that this location <br />would be much closer to his property than the alternate home site. <br />Henderson stated that the most attractive building site for any potential homeowner would be the <br />site in the back versus the one up front on the hill. <br />Oaffron pointed out diat die location of the septic site would likely drive where die house building <br />site would be. He agreed that the hill side site would be difficult, as die septic lines would have to <br />run a long distance and acrou the creek bed. While he felt diis to be an unlikely building site, he <br />noted that the ^licant could feasibly build there, or agree not to build on die steep slope. <br />Henderson agreed, stating that the hillside locadoo would not likely be a desirable one, and <br />indicated that they would consider die suggestion. <br />Koehler asked what the location for the outlet and setbacks for the driveway were being proposed <br />at. <br />Gaffitm stated diet the oudot would be a IS’ wide driveway corridor that narrows. He noted that <br />the driveway was placed merely S' from the lot line uid quesdoned whether the outlot should be <br />wida or whedier die driveway widm die oudot offret <br />PAGE 29 of 64 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.