My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 9:26:22 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 8:59:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
». • , <br />p <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. <br />Mabusth stated the gazebo and deck structure would not have been <br />subject to the average lakeshore setback at that time, but they <br />were subject to the 75* setback and hardcover standards and a <br />building permit would have been required. <br />Indritz asked why that was not noted on the inspection records at <br />that time. He introduced John Cardwell who is aware that the <br />structures have been there for at least 25 years; Walt KIndsudder <br />worked on the 1982 renovation project; and Warren Matheson worked <br />with Hollander In building the deck in 1974. <br />Rowlette remembered an addition to her house In 1974 and the <br />restrictions in place at that time. She stated she found it hard <br />to believe that the structures were approved to be built at that <br />time. She said that she was on the property in the early 1970s and <br />recalls the house with two decks and the screen porch. She said <br />she did not remember the gazebo and lakeside deck being there. <br />Cohen asked what the applicant Is requesting as additional square <br />footage. <br />Mabusth stated It consists of the gazebo and deck area. <br />Indritz stated that there was a trade off for the garage, which was <br />removed, and Hollander was allowed to construct a deck. He noted <br />that because of the narrowness of the lot, virtually any <br />construction is going to bo in violation of the 75 zone. <br />Cohen asked if Mr. Hollander had any other documentation for the <br />construction of the gazebo In 1974. <br />Hoi lander noted he nas not found any documentation as such to date. <br />Cohen noted that to realize any capital gains on the property, ho <br />would have to have records showing improvements to the project. <br />Hoi lander stated that he has had two major catastrophes In the home <br />In which many documents were lost. He said he can recollect <br />building the structures In 1974. <br />Cohen asked If there was any hardcover that could be removed In the <br />0-75’ zone. <br />K <br />A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.