My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1992
>
08-17-1992 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 9:26:22 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 8:59:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MAY 18, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1737 - CONT. <br />Hollander stated that there is a portion of plastic liner adjacent <br />to the house that could be removed. Because of the narrow lot, the <br />Improvements near the ground need to be retained to prevent further <br />erosion. In the 75-250’ zone, there is a gravel area that could <br />be removed because the garage no longer exists and there Is some <br />additional plastic that could be removed all which amounts to 530 <br />s.f. based on the surveyor’s calculation. <br />Cohen asked If the City has any records of the gazebo. <br />Hollander noted that the debris shown on the pictures taken after <br />the 1987 storm was from the gazebo. The lands Iide covered over the <br />existing deck structure and knocked down the gazebo. <br />Cohen asked if Hollander had any picture from 1974 to 1987 showing <br />the gazebo. <br />Hollander explained that the fire destroyed any pictures that he <br />may have had. <br />Cardwell remembered that in 1982 he was on the property and <br />recalled the gazebo, which appeared to have been there for quite <br />some time. <br />Peterson noted that the existing detached screen porch is in need <br />of repair and asked if It would be possible to remove It ail <br />together. <br />Rowlette stated that the Improvements on the lot have Intensified. <br />Indritz stated that his client feels the improvements are <br />grandfathered in, and noted that Hollander is willing to remove the <br />530 square feet of additional hardcover. <br />Rowlette explained that any run-off from the property ends up In <br />the lake, which is damaging the lake environment. <br />Johnson said he respected Hollander’s position, but felt they <br />should be consistent with other applications. He felt that a stair <br />and landing portion would be a minimum of what is needed to gain <br />access to the lake. He felt that If permit approval was sought In <br />1974, the applicant probably would not have received the approval <br />needed. <br />Cohen clarified that a portion of the deck and the gazebo should <br />be removed. <br />I . <br />I <br />:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.