Laserfiche WebLink
^ • <br />W5-3I31 <br />December 8,2003 <br />Pages <br />F. Lot Layout and Lot Standards (RP'JD) <br />Planning Commission concluded that the RPUD standards for SFR development are generally <br />appropriate for this site, with a few minor revisions. The RPUD standards [Section 78-626(8)] <br />are summarized as follows: <br />-15,000 sf min. dry buildable lot area (PC indicated 14,000 sf min. was acceptable) <br />- 90* minimum lot width at the setback line (all 8 new lots meet this using a 30' street <br />setback...) <br />> 125' minimum lot depth (Lots 4,5,6,7 and 10 are just short of this standard, but these <br />depths are a result of significant tweaking to date, and each lot contains a usable <br />building site with acceptable rear yard. <br />• 40' rear yard or 20% of lot d^th, whichever is less (all lots meet this standard) <br />- 25' front setback on internal streets (30 ’ was used for this plat and will be used for <br />home construction, which allows the lots to meet the 90’ lot width standard) <br />• 50' setback on collector or arterial streets (existing Williamson house at 40 ’ will remain <br />nonconforming...) <br />- 10* side yard on interior lot lines (all lots conform), 15' side yard at exterior of RPUD <br />(eosillHetf Lot 5 proposed at 10\ should revise io 15*; north yard of Lot 3 <br />should increase to IS*; west yard of Lot 6 should revise to IS*) <br />- side yards abutting street must meet front setback requirement (all lots meet this) <br />• 30' max building height (based on proposed grading plan - no need for variances) <br />G. Lot Coverage vi. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) <br />Section 78-1403, the 15% Lot Coverage limit, states that the 15% limit applies to ^ zoning <br />districts; it doesn ’t make an exception for RPUD. However, the RPUD District does not <br />specifrcally establish a ‘Lot Coverage by Structures’ limit. Instead, the RPUD standards limit <br />individual lots to 50% hardcover and an individual lot Floor Area Ratio (FAR = gross area of all <br />flo(H9 divided by gross lot area) of 0.5. This means a 14,(KX) s.f. lot is allowed 7,000 s.f. of floor <br />qMce. A 2-story 30 ’ x 70* walkout with a basement, two stories, and an attach^ 3-stall, 1-level <br />24’ X 30 ’ garage would yield 7020 s.f. of floor area, as an example. <br />The 8 proposed homes range to as much as 25% lot coverage. Planning Conunission reviewed <br />the potential home sizes based on using the 0.5 FAR versus the 15% lot coverage limit, and <br />reconunended that the 0.5 FAR should apply to this development, but not the 15% lot coverage <br />limit This area is not in a shoreland h^cover zone, and hardcover of 50% per the RPUD <br />standards is not unreasonable. <br />H. Road Layout ami Standards <br />The proposed road layout meets the corridor standards of a 50' road right-of-way and 100' cul- <br />de-sac diameter. The access location onto Willow Drive is directly across from Elm Lane, which <br />is appit^ate. The City would normally require that all lots in a subdivision be served with <br />driveways from the new local road rather than from tihe arterial (Willow is deflned in the CMP as