My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
12-12-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 2:21:47 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 1:59:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^ • <br />W5-3I31 <br />December 8,2003 <br />Pages <br />F. Lot Layout and Lot Standards (RP'JD) <br />Planning Commission concluded that the RPUD standards for SFR development are generally <br />appropriate for this site, with a few minor revisions. The RPUD standards [Section 78-626(8)] <br />are summarized as follows: <br />-15,000 sf min. dry buildable lot area (PC indicated 14,000 sf min. was acceptable) <br />- 90* minimum lot width at the setback line (all 8 new lots meet this using a 30' street <br />setback...) <br />> 125' minimum lot depth (Lots 4,5,6,7 and 10 are just short of this standard, but these <br />depths are a result of significant tweaking to date, and each lot contains a usable <br />building site with acceptable rear yard. <br />• 40' rear yard or 20% of lot d^th, whichever is less (all lots meet this standard) <br />- 25' front setback on internal streets (30 ’ was used for this plat and will be used for <br />home construction, which allows the lots to meet the 90’ lot width standard) <br />• 50' setback on collector or arterial streets (existing Williamson house at 40 ’ will remain <br />nonconforming...) <br />- 10* side yard on interior lot lines (all lots conform), 15' side yard at exterior of RPUD <br />(eosillHetf Lot 5 proposed at 10\ should revise io 15*; north yard of Lot 3 <br />should increase to IS*; west yard of Lot 6 should revise to IS*) <br />- side yards abutting street must meet front setback requirement (all lots meet this) <br />• 30' max building height (based on proposed grading plan - no need for variances) <br />G. Lot Coverage vi. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) <br />Section 78-1403, the 15% Lot Coverage limit, states that the 15% limit applies to ^ zoning <br />districts; it doesn ’t make an exception for RPUD. However, the RPUD District does not <br />specifrcally establish a ‘Lot Coverage by Structures’ limit. Instead, the RPUD standards limit <br />individual lots to 50% hardcover and an individual lot Floor Area Ratio (FAR = gross area of all <br />flo(H9 divided by gross lot area) of 0.5. This means a 14,(KX) s.f. lot is allowed 7,000 s.f. of floor <br />qMce. A 2-story 30 ’ x 70* walkout with a basement, two stories, and an attach^ 3-stall, 1-level <br />24’ X 30 ’ garage would yield 7020 s.f. of floor area, as an example. <br />The 8 proposed homes range to as much as 25% lot coverage. Planning Conunission reviewed <br />the potential home sizes based on using the 0.5 FAR versus the 15% lot coverage limit, and <br />reconunended that the 0.5 FAR should apply to this development, but not the 15% lot coverage <br />limit This area is not in a shoreland h^cover zone, and hardcover of 50% per the RPUD <br />standards is not unreasonable. <br />H. Road Layout ami Standards <br />The proposed road layout meets the corridor standards of a 50' road right-of-way and 100' cul- <br />de-sac diameter. The access location onto Willow Drive is directly across from Elm Lane, which <br />is appit^ate. The City would normally require that all lots in a subdivision be served with <br />driveways from the new local road rather than from tihe arterial (Willow is deflned in the CMP as
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.