12-12-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#0»131 Dcccnibcr 8,200S Page 4 f f B. Rclationihip to Surrounding Development This proposed SFR development for 8 new homes has an average dry buildable lot area of slightly under 16,000 s.f., with no new building lots less than 14,000 s.f. as recommended by the Planning Conunission. This fits into the general range of lot sizes in the surrounding neighborhood. The Hackberry neighborhood directly to the west in Orono has existing developed SFR lots generally ranging in size from 17,000 s.f. to 22,000 s.f. The Glendale Drive neighborhood in Long Lake (southeast of the church) has lots in the range of 14,000 s.f. to 20,000 s.f. The Harrington Drive neighborhood in Long Lake (behind the fire station) has lots ranging from under 12,C00 s.f. to 25,000 s.f. When Parcel Group 3 was re-guided, a density of 2-3 units per acre SFR was chosen, which would be an average lot size of 14,000-22,000 s.f., very similar to the surrounding development. C. Conservation Design Parcel Group 3 is one of the areas reviewed as part of the Rural Oasis visioning study. The City’s planning consultants DSU presented an analysis of i.nportant visual elements about Parcel Group 3 that will help define how Parcel Group 3 should be developed. While specific ordinances are not yet in place, this subdivisdion as a RPUD planned development has been required to address the visual impacts and the elements of Conservation Design. A key element in this plat should be the retention and enhancement of natural views looking northeastward towards the site from Willow Drive. Applicant has provided preliminary recommendations from AES, which Council should review (^Exhibit F). D. Wetlaad Impacts - WCA ConsIdcratioM, Buffers, etc. The southwesterly portion of the property contains wetlands which will be protected by a Conservation and Flowage Easement, save for a portion of a small wetland finger extending into Lot 8. Applicant is proposing to fill a 2000 sf portion of this finge;, the deminimus amount of fill allow^ by WCA regulations without requiring mitigation. Because of this filling. Lots 7 and 8 would not require variances for the wetland buffer setback established in the City’s new wetland ordinance. Applicant will also be requesting that MCWD approve the revised wetland delineation that reclassifies portions of the ditch wetland along Willow Drive as “incidental ” and acceptable to fill for roadway (and future trail) purposes. E. Stormwater and Drainage Improvements and/or Easements Needed The proposed development is required to provide stormwater management systems including a NURP pond which is imposed in Outlot A. The entire property including wetlands and the Williamson residence lot will be subject to the Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee established for 2005 as $4,160 per acre for the Vi acre zone; no fee has been established for SFR at 2-3 units per acre, but we would expect the above rate to be in the ballpark for the proposed development. Wkaher the dturek piuvd. Lot 3, skooU be exempi/rom the SWSDT Fee is am item for fwtker tUsemssiom. i 1 J