Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />i'i <br />«0»160 <br />Oetober 12,260S <br />Pages <br />Staff Rccommendatbn <br />It is staff’s opinion that this should be a plat based on a strict interpretation of the zoning <br />and subdivision codes. <br />Planning Commission should address the issues noted above. If the conclusion is that <br />this must be a plat, with all the in^lications noted above that come along with a plat, then <br />the application should be tabled to allow the applicant to bring back a preliminary plat <br />drawing, showing specific setback impacts, etc. <br />If the conclusion is that platting and the associated fees, etc. are not appropriate, and that <br />the applicant’s combination/rearrangement/easement program is acceptable, the reasons <br />for such a conclusion should be noted, and Planning Commission should then consider <br />whether the easement as proposed is acceptable, and whether the nonconforming <br />accessory buildings in the S*acre lot should be removed or relocated. <br />,;fu <br />:-i.v <br />■I' <br />pv v-vi <br />.,lr - <br />r <br />! I <br />lU ............. ■iiiii gosMautma