Laserfiche WebLink
W5-3160 <br />October 12,2005 <br />Pate 4 <br />Also in 1992, a CUP was granted for renovation and use of the caretaker apartment in the <br />bam. City records indicate the caretaker house is connected to a conforming septic <br />system, but do not indicate how or whether the caretaker apartment in the barn is <br />connected to that system. <br />The proposed 30 ’ easement will extend to within a few feet of the horse bam, and to <br />vidthin about 35 ’ of the caretaker house; if titis easement is required to be a platted <br />Outlot, the 50 ’ required setbacks from the Outlot will not be met. The code does not <br />specify a minimum required building setback from an easement driveway, although it <br />^ould, as this has been an issue on other properties... <br />Septic Capability <br />The 21 acre parcel has conforming mound septic systems, and potentially a wide variety <br />of options for replacement sites if needed. The 5-acre lot would appear to have <br />topography suitable Tor septic systems, although no testing has been provided. If this has <br />to be a plat, septic testii g should be provided to confum adequate sites on each parcel. <br />The entire propeity is within the MUSA; if the 21 acre parcel were to be fuilher <br />subdivided into 2-.icre lots, it might be must appropriate to bring municipal sewer to the <br />property. <br />Issue for Consideration <br />1.Does Planning Commission conclude that a plat is required? Or, would Planning <br />Commission recommend waiving the platting requirement because of the various <br />implications, such as creating substandard setbacks, subjecting the applicant to <br />park and stormwater fees, requiring septic testing, etc.? <br />Does the reduction in area of the large parcel to 21 acres affect how PC would <br />view the prior variance for the horse bam as an Oversize Accessory Structure <br />exceeding the allowable size limit? <br />3.Resolution No. 3072 states that if the property is subdivided at a fumre date, the <br />bam caretaker apartment CUP automatically expires and the owner must apply for <br />a new guest house CUP... does tliis subdivision proposal trigger tliis condition, or <br />was it the intent to only require such a CUP renewal if the property on which the <br />bam sits gets significantly smaller...? <br />What should happen with the structures on the 5-acre parcel that are less than 75' <br />from the lake? <br />Other issues for discussion? <br />A