10-24-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MoMlay, October 10,2005 7:00 o’clock p.n. (005-3121 Narrows Salooa, Coatlaucd) 1.The applicant shall install a two-door system at the rear entrance to meet all State Building and Fire standards. The purpose of ibe doors would be to allow customers to enter and exit the building widMMit allowing noise to leave the building. They should be spaced so one door would close before the second door is opened. All doors shall remain closed at all times, except when entering or existing the buildmg. 2.Live entertainment will end at 12:30 a.ni each night and the Saloon shall close at 1:00 a.m. each night. 3.The front door shall not be used as an entrance during the period of time the building is used for live entertaifunent. A one-year time period is required for the applicant to monitor the use of the building and the front entrance. After one year, ^ City of Orono will review the use of the building in relation to the live entertainment and noise levels generated by the live entertainment use. Gaffron noted there have been complaints received that the doors have been propped open and noise goes out into the neighborhood. Gaffron stated this concern could be addressed by a different door design and by the Narrows’ management. 4.The property is subject to the sign ordinance for temporary and permanent signs. No signs can be located on or outsit the building without receiving a permit from the City of Orono. 5. Noise shall be held to a level as to not be in violation of the Noise Ordinance. 6.The sale of intoxicating liquor requires the business have a valid liquor license with the City of Orono. Gaffron noted a history of the liquor license applications has been provided to Council. Gaffron indicated the applicant would be required to apply for revisions to the current liquor license in conjunction with any approved expansion. Gaffron noted a mcratorium was adopted by the City Council in July with respect to development in the Navarre area. The Council indicated at the time the moratorium was adopted that the Narrows application was not intended to be subject to the moratorium; however, the language of the moratorium ordinance erroneously does not specifically exclude the Narrows, or any other properties, for which a zoning application was made prior to die moraton'im effective date. Staff recommends the following issues be considered by the Council 1. M '14 ’(•! Is the proposed location of the use in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the B-1 District and the Comprehensive Plan? PAGE 12