My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 12:30:30 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 11:55:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
:i- :. <br />• OV'- • <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />(mONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 26,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />J, #05.3080 INTERSPACE WEST, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST - <br />rUD/DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL <br />Oundlach explained that this was the final review stage of the PUD process and that the applicants <br />are requesting B-6 PUD General Development Plan approval. Final Plat approval in order to create <br />10 unit lots and one common lot, Commercial Site Plan approval in order to obtain a building <br />permit; and Easement Vacations in conjunction with dedication of new easements. <br />Gundlach noted that since the April meeting before the City Council, the applicante had been <br />determining whetficr or not they would revise their grading plan to incorporate a westerly entrance <br />in anticipation of die Highway 12 turn-back to Hennepin County. Tte applicants have since <br />that functionally and financially the access could not be revised and would like to proceed <br />with their original plan the Council recommended for approval. <br />Though the qiplicants have submitted a majority of the items necessary, the following items would <br />be required prior to filing of the plat with Hennepin County; a Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br />District (MCWD) Permit; Signed PUD No. 2C Agreement/Development Contract and signed <br />mylan; Original copy of the title opinion; Fees in the amount of SI 8,079.00; and a Letter of Credit <br />in the minunum amount of S822.848.63. which might be increased to cover the proposed <br />StormTech system now being proposed by the applicants. <br />At this time, Gundlach recommended the City Council table the applicant ’s final approvals in order <br />to allow the Engineer and sUff adequate time to review the StormTech proposal and collect the <br />appropriate documentation and fees from the applicants. <br />PngiiM^ Kellogg indicated that his firm had just received the StormTech information on Friday <br />and had net had sufficient time to analyze the proposal and weigh long-term maintenance issues <br />with die product. <br />Gina Carlson interjected that tiiis was the first she’d heard of the recommendation for tabling and <br />objected to the recommendation stating that their engineer had designed the StormTech system to <br />contain the water runoff on site. She indicated that both Mn/DOT and MCWD had voiced their <br />support pending final investigation. With regard to the increase in the letter of credit, she stated <br />that, in her opinion, they were improving the site’s water treatment program and should be entitled <br />to a decrease as opposed to an increase. Carlson asked to be given approvals based on <br />contingencies. <br />White stated that, although her request was not unreasonable, the City had concerns with regard to <br />long-term maintenance. <br />Kellogg noted that tiie catch basins must be maintained and the fine particles cleaned from the <br />basins on occasion. <br />Phil Carlson suggested that the City grant approttals subject to City Engineer approval and the <br />requited document changes. He indicated that the association would be responsible for long-term <br />maintenance. <br />.... 1 <br />PAGE 2 of 10 <br />lAitiiliMinllllSil
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.