My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
10-10-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 12:30:30 PM
Creation date
1/12/2023 11:55:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'^j <br />1 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Sqytember 26,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(3. MS-3080 tNTERSFACE WEST, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br />While Gaflron acknowledged that several of the changes could be handled administratively, he <br />commented that the StormTech system would be installed merely for rate control; therefore, not <br />entitled to credits. <br />Sansevere asked how long the City Engineer ’s firm v'ould need to complete their analysis of the <br />StormTech system. <br />Kellogg stated that it would not take long, likely just a few days. <br />White encouraged staff and the engineer to move forward and complete the changes and analysis in <br />a timely fashion so that the applicants could proceed soon. <br />While he, too, wished to see the applicants proceed, Murphy stated that the unfinished details lead <br />to other implications and he preferred to see staff ensure ongoing maintenance does not become an <br />issue. <br />In reality, Gaf&on stated that the maintenance agreements, letter of credit, changes and other <br />details c<^d be resolved within a few weeks, though the City was not in receipt of the MCWD <br />permits; therefore, the applicant cannot file a plat until these items are received. <br />Mayor Peterson commented that it seems there are always a few additional loose ends that need to <br />be tied up and she could not support the application until she was confident that staff had <br />everything in order to move forward with a recommendation. <br />Gina Carlson stated once again that she was agitated that she had not been informed until this <br />evening that the application was to be tabled. She stated that, had she known, she might have been <br />able to resolve some of the details in advance of the meeting. <br />Gaffron stated that the staff had only learned this afternoon that the engineers were not given <br />enough time to resolve questions. <br />Murphy suggested that the City be supplied with the necessary information before the next City <br />Council meeting so ftiat all of the conditions could be removed from the recommendation and they <br />be granted approvals. <br />Gaffton indicated that 2 weeks should be adequate time to finalize the details, as long as MnDOT <br />and MCWD have given the city their stamp of approval. <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to table #05*3080 Interspace West Inc., 2060 Wayzata <br />Boulevard West Adoptlou: Final Plat Resolution and Pt’D/Developnient Contract to allow <br />the inglntTn time far review and other details to be finalized. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 3 of 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.