Laserfiche WebLink
mT <br />«ms-3l29 <br />July IS, 2095 <br />Page 2 of4 <br />Exhibit O - Proposed Elevations <br />Exhibit H - Proposed Floor Plans <br />Exhibit I - City Engineer Conunents <br />Exhibit J - Aerial Photograph <br />Exhibit K - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit L - Plat Map <br />BackgroMMi <br />The owner's architect submitted this iqiplication on behalf of the owner. The owner then <br />met with staff briefly following submittal of the application for variances. The an>licant <br />was informed that staff would not support any variances to the side street lot line of Rest <br />Point Lane, as adequate buildable area exists within the setbacks. The applicant has <br />submitted a narrative to support his requested side street setback variance, attached as <br />Exhibit C. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Lot Araa/Width <br />LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 43,560 s.f (1.0 acres)140’ <br />Actual 18,994 s.f (0.44 acres)54* @ shoreline; <br />76 ’ @ 75 ’ setback <br />it I <br />LR-IB Required Existing Proposed <br />Front N/A N/A N/A <br />Rear 30’3.5’ cabin <br />28 ’ shed 30’ <br />Left Side (Rest <br />Point Lane)35’3’ house <br />13’ cabin 23 ’ <br />Right Side 10’15’10’ <br />Lakeshore 75 ’5’ boathouse <br />115’ <br />-boathouse to be <br />removed <br />Average Lakeshore*~71 ’*conforming conforming <br />^Because there are not two adjacent lakeshore residences due to the right-of-way to the <br />south, the average lakeshore setback is defined by the setback of the one adjacoit <br />lakeshore owner to the north. <br />k-- <br />* I « . <br />■ i <br />i]