Laserfiche WebLink
iraS-3129 <br />July 1S,200S <br />P»f€3of4 <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />18,994 s.f (0.44 acres)Allowed: 2,849 s.f (15%) <br />Proposed: 2,577 s.f (14%) <br />Hardcover Cakulationi <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />0-75 <br />75 - 250 <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />4,908 s.f. <br />14,086 s.f. <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />0s.f <br />(0%) <br />3,522 s.f. <br />(25%) <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />120 s.f* <br />(2.5%) <br />1,901 s.f* <br />(13.5%) <br />Proposed <br />HaHcovcr <br />Os.f <br />(0%) <br />3,520 s.f <br />(25%) <br />* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Lot Area/WMtli Variances <br />The applicant has purchased an existing lot with an existing home with a lot area of <br />18,994 s.f. or 0.44 acres and wishes to construct a new residence. The LR - 1B zoning <br />district in Mdiich the property is located requires a 1 acre minimum, requiring a lot area <br />variance. This property also contains 54* of width at the shoreline and 76* of width at the <br />75* setback when the LR - IB zoning district requires 140’ of width at the shoreline and <br />75* setback. In order to construct a new residence on this existing lot, lot area and lot <br />width variances must be granted as the lot doesn’t meet the 80% minimums allowing for <br />administrative approval. <br />Side Street Setback Variance <br />The applicant is also requesting a setback variance to the right-of-way known as Rest <br />Point Lane. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 35* setback from side yards adjacent to a <br />street, where the applicant has proposed a 23* setback. The applicant has proposed a <br />house 50* in width angled to maximize views to the lake, which results in the 23* setback <br />and thus the request for a variance. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />/a coHtUfrtMg afpUeatkMU for vorkmce, Ike RtoHnbig Commission skett eonsUer Ike tffed of Ike <br />pro p&eei vortemee upon Ike keoHk, ufeiy end welfmre of ike eommunhy, exbilMg end onilclpoied <br />Irojfk eomdUom, llgkl end oir, donger of fire, risk lo Ike public sofety, end Ike effect on values of <br />properly lu Ike surrouudlug area. Tke Houulug Cournhskm skoll consider recommaidiHg approval <br />for vurkmcat fiom die Ideral provbhus ^ tke Zoning Code In Instances wkere tkeir strkt <br />eufbrceaamt wo uld comae undue kardskip becouse 0/ clrcumslonces unique to tke Individual <br />properly under com lderodon, and akod recommmd reproved only wken k Is demonstrated tkat suck <br />oe dou a wIM be In keeping wkk tke spMt and kdent of tke Orono Zoning Code.