My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 11:25:44 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 10:57:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Angnst 8,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(005^125 Christlac Vakrini, ConUnncd) <br />Muipl^ inquired whether the signage for the two offices was included in the original application. <br />Gundlach stated it was not. <br />Murphy inquired where the monument sign would be located. <br />Gundlach stated it would be located on the Shadywood side of the building in the northern comer, which <br />does meet all the required setbacks. <br />Murphy indicated he had the understanding at the last meeting that no signage would be permitted under <br />the resolution, which would include Caribou Coffee. <br />Gundlach stated Caribou Coffee was a separate application for a conditional use permit. Gundlach stated <br />signage for Caribou Coffee was not discussed. <br />Valerius stated signage for the two offices was also not discussed at the council meeting. <br />Peterson commented it was her understanding that the offices would not generate a high amount of baffic <br />and that signage would not be necessary. <br />Valerius stated in her opinion the tenants should have the right to erect a sign. <br />Peterson noted the business was approved conditionally. <br />Gundlach stated die City has the right to impose reasonable standards to insure that the use operates in the <br />manner the City would like it to operate Gtmdlach stated the two main issues discussed were the impact <br />on the parking and how intense the use would be. <br />Barrett stated to his understanding the City can inqiose some restrictions with a conditional use permit but <br />diat the legal question is what the B-1 zoning allows for signage. Barrett stated if signage is allowed in <br />the B*1 zoning district, the City probably could not prohibit signage on this site as part of the ctmditional <br />use permit. <br />McMillan commented she was surprised that a monument sign was going to be erected on this site. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the size of monument sign being proposed in this instance exists elsewhere in <br />the area. <br />White sUted there are also similar signs located in the neighborhood. White commented that the <br />applicant has put a considerable investment in this property and that this area currently has a number of <br />signs. <br />PAGE 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.