My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 11:25:44 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 10:57:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r- <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, Aagait 8,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock pja. <br />S. MS412S CHRISTINE VALERIUS, 2377 SHADYWOOD ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT - AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 5359 <br />Christine Valerius, Applicant, was present. <br />Gundlach stated the applicant received approval of a conditional use permit to allow an office in a B-1 <br />zoning district at the July 25,2005 Council meeting. Following approval of the resolution, the applicant <br />hM requested an amendment to allow for monument signage for the proposed office uses. The signage <br />was prohibited utuler the ^iproved resolution. Gundlach indicated the proposed signage by the applicant <br />has been included in Council’s packet as Exhibit A. Gundlach noted Item 6 of the resolution prohibits <br />exterior building signage for the proposed offices except for a nameplate to be no larger than 1.5 square <br />feet per office use, with monument signage being inohibited. <br />Gundlach stated it was Staffs understanding the offices would be one and two person offices requiring <br />limited to no customer visits, which would also factor into the amount of parking required. Staff felt <br />allowing monument signage may not meet the intent of the approval as monument signage is typically <br />desired to draw customers into die site. <br />Valerius indicated she was surprised that the restriction on the signage was included in the resolution and <br />that it would be difficult to rent the office space if the tenant is not allowed to erect a sign. <br />Sansevere stated he had the undentanding that only one office would be rented. <br />Valerius stated they are planning to occupy one of the offices but that in the future they may decide to <br />rent that office out u well. Valerius stat^ Caribou Coffee has agreed to make their sign smaller to <br />accomnwdate the other signage on the monument sign. <br />McMillan inquired whether Caribou Coffee is allowed to have a monument sign. <br />Gundlach noted Caribou Coffee is operating under a conditional use permit and is in compliance with the <br />signage requirements for the B*1 District. Gundlach stated 254 square feet of signage is allowed under <br />the code for this zone. <br />McMillan inquired whether Caribou Coffee would also have signage on the building in addition to the <br />monument sign. <br />Gundlach indicated there would be. <br />McMillan inquired whether the applicant is interested in erecting signage on the building. <br />Valerius stated she is not. <br />White indicated he does not have a problem with the request to amend the resolution and concurred that it <br />would be difficuh to rent the q>ace if the tenant is not allowed to display a sign. White noted the tenant <br />would not be a high-volume business. <br />FAGE3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.