My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 11:25:44 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 10:57:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />i MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Aagntt 8,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(00S>3125 Christine Valerios, Contlnned) <br />Valerius stated signage was not discussed at the previous council meeting and that she was not notified <br />that signage would not be allowed on the property until she received the resolution in the mail. <br />Peterson pointed out that the other businesses in this neighborhood do not have a freestanding sign. <br />Gundlach indicated the other properties do not meet the requirements for a freestanding sign. <br />Murphy stated in his view a monument sign might be excessive for this property, but since the City has <br />allowed signage for Caribou Coffee on this site, it would be difTicult to restrict the other two offices from <br />erecting a sign. <br />Sansevere inquired what the size of the signs would be for the two offices. <br />Gundlach stated the applicant has indicated the signs would be eight inches tall by the length of the <br />monument. <br />Sansevere noted the two smaller signs would take up approximately two feet of the m<mument sign. <br />Peterson indicated she is in agreement with the language contained under Staffs recommendation. <br />Peterson stated she had the understanding that the office use did not require signage and that the signage <br />for Caribou Coffee would be located on the building. <br />Valerius noted a monument sign is allowed in the B*1 District and that a monument sign has been erected <br />at the Snyder Drug across the street and at Culver’s, along with a number of other businesses in the area. <br />Murphy noted the City does allow monument signs in the B-1 district. Murphy stated he did not realize <br />that Caribou Coffee was going to erect a 10-foot monument sign. <br />Gundlach noted the City did a(kq>t a monument sign amendment approximately one year ago and that this <br />sign is in compliance with those standards. <br />WhUc moved, McMillan seconded, to approve an amendment to Resolution No. 5359 for the <br />conditional use permit issued to Christine Valerius to aUow monument signage for the two office <br />spaces situated above Caribon Coffee located at 2377 Shadywood Road as proposed. <br />Sansevere commented he has the impression that the offices are being portrayed in two different ways <br />depending on what the applicant wants at the time. Sansevere stated he feels like he has been duped. <br />Valerius stated it was never her intent to try to dupe anybody on the council and that she was not aware of <br />the restriction on the signage. Valerius acknowledged that their application did change slightly as time <br />went on. Valerius reiterated the restriction on the signage was never discussed. <br />PAGE 5 <br />I <br />i.binmiain^i ,r.tfM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.