My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:48:03 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^OS-3125 <br />Junt20,2003 <br />Page 3 of4 <br />Hardcover Calcabtions <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />500- 1 <br />Total Area In <br />Zone <br />10,350 s.f. <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />3,622.5 s.f. <br />(35%) <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />2,686 s.f.* <br />(26®/^ <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />2,762 s.f. <br />(27«/o) <br />Side Street Setback Variance <br />The applicant has requested approval of a side street setback variance to permit <br />construction of a staircase, which would access the proposed accessory oHlce. This <br />request consists of an encroachment of an additional 2.5 ’ on the required yard where 24’ <br />currently exists, 35’ is normally required, and 24’ was iq>proved in 2004 for the addition. <br />Because the staircase leads to the second story it becomes structural and must meet the <br />required building setbacks, therefore requiring variance approval. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the triplication. <br />Hardship Analysfa <br />At eomUerlitt apptlaithms for vmrUmee, the Phuinlng CommitshH skoll consider the effect of the <br />propo sed vorhmee upon the heolth, sofety end welfare 0/ the community, existing and antlclpoted <br />Irpffle conditions, l^tondolr, dongeroffbe, risk to the pnhilc sofety, end the effect on values of <br />property ht the sorroonMig area. The Mooning ComnUssloH shall consider recommending opproval <br />fee vorlaneet fiom the Uteral provIsloHS ofriu Zoning Code In Instances where their stria <br />enforce ment wooU canse nndne hardship beeanse of circnmsiances uniqne to the Individual <br />property under considerodon, and shall recommend ttyproval only when It Is demonstrated that such <br />actions adtt he In keeping with the spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff finds there is no real hardship inherent to the land to allow a iWther encroachment <br />on the side street of Lyric Avenue. Staff feels that the existing construction plans could <br />be revised to allow for an interior access. Another alternative is to incorporate a door on <br />the northern side of the addition, at the main level, where the Zoning Ordinance would <br />permit a stoop as a non-encroachment. Both of these alternatives would address the <br />iqiplicant’s neml of wanting to access a private office without going through the coffee <br />shop area. In addition to not having a hardship, the proposed staircase would have <br />negative visual impacts. <br />ConditfcMial Use Permit Analysb <br />The B - 1, Retail Sales Business District is catered towards uses providing goods or <br />services specifically to the residents of the neighborhood. While offices of a general <br />nature do not fit into this category, they are permitted as a conditional use due to the low <br />impact this type of use creates. Section 78-916 establishes the following findings under <br />which the Planning Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use permit: <br />Sec. 78-916. Granting of permit. <br />(a) The plaiming commission may recommend and the council may grant a <br />ccHiditional use permit as the use permit was applied for or in modified form, if on the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.