My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:48:03 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
May M. 200S <br />nif»2ofs <br />lines except for drainage swales and ditches. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Applications <br />Exhibit B - Hai^hip Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C - Existing Survey <br />Exhibit D - Existing Stormwater Control Methods <br />Exhibit E - Proposed Survey and Grading <br />Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculation Worksheets <br />Exhibit O - Proposed House Elevations <br />Exhibit H - Projwsed House Floor Plans <br />Exhibit I - Proposed Detached Garage Plans <br />Exhibit J - City Engineer Comments <br />Exhibit K - Building Inspector Comments <br />Exhibit L - Alternate Crying Plan (attempt to meet City Engineer recommendations) <br />Exhibit M - Adjacent Property Owner’s Acknowledgement Forms/Comments <br />ExhibitN - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit O - Plat Map <br />Background <br />The applicant originally submitted plans for review at the April Planning Commission <br />meeting. The applicant was sent a letter confirming receipt of all necessary materials for <br />review of the application. The City Engineer was then forwarded the plans whereby <br />further information with regard to the grading plan was requested. The applicant’s <br />architect and engineer were informed of the City Engineer concerns, where a new grading <br />plan would have to be drafted. Because the gr^ing concerns were specifically related to <br />the width of the lot, staff required that the applicant draft a plan meeting the City <br />Engineer expectations prior to review by the Plamiing Commission, as possible changes <br />to the proposed home may result from those changes. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />Lot Afaa/WMth <br />LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 43,560 s.f (1.0 acres)140’ <br />Actual 27,980 s.f. (0.64 acres)66 ’ @ shoreline; <br />70’ @ 75 ’ setback <br />Setbacks <br />LR-IB Reqnircd Existing Proposed <br />Front N/A N/A N/A <br />Rear (street)30’126’ garage <br />155 ’ house <br />12’ detached garage <br />98 ’ house
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.