Laserfiche WebLink
#05-3100 <br />May 16,2005 <br />Page 3 of5 <br />Left Side (north)10’10’ garage <br />11 ’ house 10’ <br />Right Side (south)10’12’ house 10’ <br />Lakeshore 75’ <br />190’ house <br />67’ boat-house <br />56’ boat-house deck <br />178’ <br />Average Lakeshore 133 ’± <br />Boat-house is <br />encroaching entirely <br />- house conforming <br />Conforming <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Area <br />27,980 s.f. (0.64 acres) <br />Total Structural Coverage <br />Allowed: 4,197 s.f. (15%) <br />Proposed: 3,599 s.f (13%) <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />0-75 <br />75 - 250 <br />250 - 500 <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />5,120 s.f <br />13,020 s.f <br />9,840 s.f <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />0s.f <br />(0%) <br />3,255 s.f <br />(25%) <br />2,952 s.f <br />(30%) <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />493 s.f • <br />(9.63%) <br />4,636 s.f * <br />(35.61%) <br />2,143 s.f * <br />(21.78%) <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0s.f <br />(0%) <br />3,231 s.f <br />(24.8%) <br />2,872 s.f <br />(29.2%) <br />* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Lot AreaAVidth Variances <br />The lot is located in the LR - IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District requiring a <br />minimum lot area of 1 acre and 140’ of width at the shoreline and at the required 75* <br />setback. This lot is 0.64 acres in area and 66’ in width at the shoreline and 70 ’ in width at <br />the 75’ setback. The applicant has requested to tear the existing house, detached garage, <br />and boathouse down and construct a new residence, including a detached garage located <br />at the street. The substandard area and width requires variance approval in order to <br />rebuild. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additiona* testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />/« eomtUerbig agpUaMmafer imrkmce, tke PUumImt C»m mluhm tktU auukler Ike effect tff tke <br />fropoaed vmrtemce upon Ike keohk, apfety ond weffore of tke comm unity, exbtlng ond mnk^tnled <br />tnffk condMont, t^kt ond olr, donger of/Ire, rhk to tke pnkllc tofety, ond die effect on mines iff <br />property In Ike snrronndlng oreo. Tke Ptonnbtg Commission skoll consider recommmding oppromi <br />for voHoncesffom die Ulerolprovisions ofike Zoning Code In butonces wkere tkeir strict <br />enjbrcement wonU cense nndne kerdsk^ hecense of draunstonces nulqne to tke IndlvUnol <br />pro perty nnder eonsidemtion, end ^ett recommend epprovel only wken It b danons»eied diet seek <br />ecdons wM ke ki keeping mkk die spirit end kitent of tke Orono Zoning Code,