My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:48:03 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
«0S-3I00 <br />May 16,2005 <br />Page 1 of5 <br />Date Application Received: 3-18-05 <br />Date ApplicatioB Considered as Complete: 5-3-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Eipircs: 7-2-05 <br />To:Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Janice Gundlach, City Planner^ <br />May 6,2005 <br />05-3100, & Sheryl Palm, 1146 Wildhurst Trail, <br />Lot Area/Width Variances - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR- IB, One Family Lal.eshore Residential District (1 acre min.) <br />0.64 acres (27,980 s.f.) <br />66 ’ @ shoreline; 70 ’ @ 75’ setback (140’ required) <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct a <br />new residence on an existing lot: <br />1. Lot area variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot 0.64 <br />acres in area when 1.0 acres is normally required. <br />2. Lot width variance to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot <br />66 ’ in width at the shoreline and 70 ’ in width at the 75’ setback when 140’ in <br />width is normally required. <br />3. Conditional use permit to allow retaining walls and grading within 5’ of a lot line. <br />SUtff Recommend&tUm: Staff recommends approval of the requested lot area and width <br />variances, however would recommend deni^ of the conditional use permit to allow <br />retaining walls and grading within 5’ of the lot line. Staffs position is the potential <br />safety and maintenance issues involving a retaining wall of the height proposed and its <br />placement directly along the property line.__________________________________ <br />Pcrtiacat Zoulug Ordinance Sections <br />Sec. 78-330. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. <br />(b) Lots. The fiDllowing minimum requirements shal be observed: <br />IM Area (ftcrt)Ul WMlIi (fMt)Front Yard (feel)Side Yard Adjacent to <br />Another Lot (feet) <br />Rear Yard (feel)Side Yard Adjacent to <br />Street (feet) <br />1 140 35 10 30 35 <br />Sec. 78-967. Exception, (b) Such grading and earth movement shall be subject to <br />fq>proval by the building inspector at the time of issuance of a building permit, provided <br />that a plan showing proper drainage and protection of adjoining property has been <br />submitted. Where such earth movement is not being performed in conjunction with a <br />building permit, a separate land alteration permit shall be required. Any unusual land <br />alterations, including earth filling, removal or grading, proposed by a builder shall be <br />subject to a conditional use permit as provided for in this chapter. The following land <br />alterations shall be considered as unusual land alterations: (3) Grading or alterations <br />that would propose any changes in elevations within five feet of adjacent residential lot
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.