My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:43:49 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />m: - p <br />k::M <br />(8. 805-3080 INTEMSPACB WEST, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br />Gina Carlson, of Interspace West, stated that they had met with the neighbors and clarified die <br />proposed heists and addressed their concerns. <br />Philip Carlson, of Interspace West, inquired whether construction of a surmountable curb between <br />this and the neighboring strip mall was mandatory, since he did not know if the other owner would <br />agree to diis as a condition. <br />Oaffron stated diat, although the Fire Marshall would prefer to see a left turn lane into the site <br />constructed, a curb at the location noted would suffice for now if possible since a left Utm lane into <br />the site is unachievable. <br />Murphy indicated that, widi the inqiending turnback of Highway 12, the construction of a left hand <br />turn lane would not be out of die questicm in the future. <br />Jackie Ricks, 2108 Sugarwoods Drive, urged the developer to preserve as many of the large pine <br />trees on the site between die development and the homesites as possible. <br />Evelyn Schommer, 2106 Sugarwoods Drive, die resident direcdy behind the pine trees, was <br />concerned that the removal of the first several rows of large old pine trees would open up her <br />backyard to highway noise, li^ts, and view of the furthest west building. She encouraged the <br />Council to recommend that the developer do their best to preserve these trees. <br />Oaffiron stated that the developer does not know at this point how many trees would be impacted <br />until they get into the project. <br />Schommer explained that die 60’ pine trees were originally planted when the property was an old <br />farmstead. Fiirthennore, she felt preserving more of the trees would also enhance the views from <br />the development’s windows, as well as her own. <br />Sansevere questioned whether the trees had to be removed. <br />Gina Carlaon stated diat some would need to be removed to make room for sewer, grading, and <br />retaining walls. She also stated that they would tala a look at further preservation when doing the <br />survey work and retaining walls. <br />White suggested that an inventory of trees that are present now and an indication of which of those <br />would be removed would be helpful. <br />Murphy encouraged the two sides to continue to talk and keep the lines of communication open. <br />While he agreed that it would be a shame to lose the trees, Sansevere commended the developer <br />and neighbors for working together to address each others concerns. He encouraged the developer <br />to do their best to preserve u many of the trees as possible, though he would understand if the <br />removal of some wu necessary. <br />PAGE 6 of 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.