Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(8. mS-Sm INTEMSPACE WEST, 2960 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, ContiHued) <br />McMillan pointed out that once the land is cleared and the retaining walls constructed, the <br />landscaping is the first phase of the development. <br />White moved, Murphy seconded, adopting the amended RESOLUTION NO. 5296, as <br />dlKussed regarding page 5, item 3, that a snrmonntable access shall be ‘researched* along the <br />northerly portion of the western property boundary, also granting Concept Plan Approval <br />for the property located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevard for Interspace-West, Inc. VOTE: Ayes <br />5, Nays 0. <br />9. #05-3085 JULANN, INC, 3455 SHORELINE DRIVE-COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN <br />REVIEW <br />Oundlach explained that, based on the tack of on-site parking and the existing parking shortage of <br />2.5 stalls before the addition of flte proposed use, the Planning Commission voted to deny the <br />request for a conmieicial site plan. The applicants have submitted a shared parking space license <br />agreement with the Keaveny property, as a means for acquiring additional parking. Gundlach <br />encouraged the Council to review the ingress and egress agreement currently existing for the site <br />and die shared parking space license agreement, including the Keaveny amendment for access to <br />those spaces, and determine if the site will be negatively impacted by ^e introduction of this new <br />use. <br />In li^t of the serious parking deficiencies at die site, Murphy pointed out that the Planning <br />Commission held a long discussion regarding this application at its last meeting. <br />Sansevere stated diat, if he was the applicant, it would concern him that if the Keavenys terminate <br />the license agreement for any reason he would have to vacate his place of business. He questioned <br />whedier die ^iplicant hilly understood the ramifications of diis agreement to his/her business. <br />Murphy cautioned die Council that here they were once again examining the Navarre area, after <br />having just received a letter from the Planning Commission urging the Council to develop a plan or <br />set of standards for the Navarre area before allowing further piece-meal development. He stated <br />that he mw no reason not to grant approval to proceed, as long as the applicant understood the <br />implications of die license agreement. <br />Attorney Barrett reminded the Council that it is one thing for the applicants to state at this time that <br />they will willingly vacate the premises, than it is for them to actually do so if the circumstances <br />arise. He stated dmt the City should require the applicants to write an occupancy permit with the <br />lessees to this effect. <br />The owner of Liza Jane’s Hair Design, 3445 Shoreline Drive, stated that while maintaining the fact <br />that die mall is already severely short on parking, she questioned where the additional 8 spaces <br />would be placed, iqi or down below. She voiced her concern that, as a street side business, she was <br />paying a premium for street fiontage with limited parking as it was. She asked whether the strip <br />mall owner should be required to add additional spaces iqi top, or at minimum stripe those that do <br />exist. <br />PAGE 7 of 14 <br />1 <br />1' <br />Li&ta.