Laserfiche WebLink
/^05-1076 <br />Jiiitiiury IK, 20(KS <br />.1 of 5 <br />'I'olal lad Area Total Structural <'overage <br />18,490 s.f. (0.42 acres)Allowed: 2.7T3.5 .s.f. (15%) <br />Propo.sed: 2,364 s.f (12.8%) <br />Hardcover C!alculations <br />Hardcover <br />/one <br />0 75 <br />75 250 <br />'I'ohil Area in <br />'/Ante <br />7540 s.f. <br />10,05 0 s.r. <br />Allowed <br />IJanlc«»yer <br />0 s>' <br />(0%) _ <br />2,737.5 .s.r. <br />(25%J <br />* Ha.scdon I’C report from 2003 application <br />Kxistiii}' <br />Hardcover <br />650 .s.r <br />(8.6%) <br />2,538 s.r ” <br />(23.05%)* <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />o.s.r <br />(0%) <br />2,737 .s.r <br />(25'J^ <br />l.ot Area/I.ot Widlli Variance <br />(’urrcntly there are two 50 ’ wide lakcshorc lots containing Ic.ss than 10,000 s.f. of area. <br />riic.se 10,000 s.f. lots were legally plaited prior to adoption of ilic current /.oiiing <br />Ordinance. The applicants have propo.sed to comhine these lots in an effort to gain more <br />area and width to allow construction of a single family residential home. In combining <br />thc.se lots a net lot area of 18,490 s.f. is piopo.sed when 43,560 s.f. is retpiired; and a lot <br />width ol 100.58 ’ at the shoreline and 75 ’ .setback is propo.sed when 140 ’ is normally <br />reriuircd. 'Hie propo.sed lot area and lot width, when 1280 and 1290 are combined, do not <br />meet the standards for adminislralive approval and llierefore rc(|uire Ibrnial approval of <br />lot area and lot width variances. <br />Hardship Statcmciil <br />Apjjlieant has provided a brief hard.ship statcnicnt in lixhibit H, and should be asked (dr <br />additional te.stimony regarding the application. <br />Hard.ship Analysis _ <br />/« fuiisiilt ’rinf! upplicalioiis fur vurianrt, the Planniuf’ r 'ummhsion shall cunsiJrr the rjfcct of the <br />in u/>0M ‘J vai ianve upon the health, safety atul u-eljare of the eommiiaity, existio)’ anil anticipate J <br />trajj/le eoiuHlIons, llphf amt air, danger of fire, risk to the piihlic safety, aail the effect on values of <br />property in the surrounJInff area, I he Plaitniiiff I’oniinission shall consider recommending approval <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoninf; i 'ode in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would canse undue hardship because of circumstances uniifue to the individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such <br />actions will he in keepinp with the spirit and intent of the Orono /.oninu Code. <br />•Stall fmds that the liaidsliip lies in the timeframe under which lhe.se lots were (Ir.st <br />platted I he e.si.sting hou.se was coii.stmi te*l .solely on I2S0 prior to mid 19S0 ’s as well <br />as single family residences on 12 /0 and I2(.0 .Spruce IMace, all of which aie 50 ’ wide <br />lakeshore lots. 1290 Spruce IMace remains entirely vacant cum iitly. Stall tbeielore finds <br />that combination ol 1280 and 1290, while still non conlonmiig m aica and width, <br />provides a more coiilbrnmig situation than the remaining 50 ’ wide lots to the norlli. I he <br />proposed plans coiilbriil to the height and story re.strictions ol the /.oiiing Ordinance and