Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Antennas <br />June 12, 1991 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />This kind of an ordinance amendment would prohibit the use <br />of the watertower in Navarre located within a residential zone. <br />The Planning Commission is also asked to consider if an <br />industrial or commercial permitted use was to install a tower on <br />their property, as long as that tower met the minimum required <br />height deemed necessary by the amendment, would Members have a <br />problem with another user installing an antenna on an existing <br />tower? Under the current Planning Commission directive, these <br />users would not be allowed. <br />It may be more appropriate for the City to draft an <br />ordinance similar to the proposed ordinance amendment for <br />Minnetonka included in your May packets that deals with the <br />attaching of antennas in zoning districts where there already <br />exists a legal structure adaptabx.j for the attaching of antennas. <br />The ordinance would have to exclude such use for residentially <br />used or residentially developed properties whereby a ham radio <br />operator installs a tower for private residential use. The <br />ordinance shall specifically exclude all commercial use of <br />residential/hobby use tower structures. <br />Will the Planning Commission amend it's original directives <br />to staff and expand the scope of the ordinance amendment to <br />include attaching of antennas to approved structures at a minimum <br />60' height as long as those structures are located within <br />industrial, commercial or non-residential used but residential ly <br />zoned properties. This will allow the use of the Navarre <br />watertower and if the City was to install a watertower along <br />Highway 12 outside of the B-6 PUD zoning district. <br />1 <br />iMiii