Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />Zoning File #1619 <br />February 14, 1991 <br />Page 9 <br />a) front setback for Lot 1; <br />b) direct driveway access to unimproved private roadway not <br />meeting City standards for Lot 3; <br />c) drainfield sites that do not strictly meet wetland <br />setback or slope requirements; <br />d) variance for lack of approved cul-de-sao within the <br />public or private roadway serving the properties; <br />e) technically, a variance for allowing slopes in excess of <br />18% as creditable dry buildable area (the City has rarely <br />made use of this code section, but this may be the time to <br />use it); <br />f) further, depending on Planning Commission's <br />interpretation of access requirements, a variance may be <br />needed for the width of Outlet B and the lack of a cul-de- <br />sac for Outlet B. <br />g) Lots 1 and 2 require a variance for lack of frontage on <br />a public road. <br />Copies of the various pertinent code sections have been <br />attached for reference purposes. <br />Staff Reccamendatlon - <br />Staff recommends as follows: <br />The developer should be required to upgrade the portions of <br />Lyman Avenue abutting his property and within the current <br />public right-of-way. <br />The developer should be required to dedicate additional <br />right-of-way over the existing portions of Lyman Avenue <br />within his property boundaries. <br />Additional land in the southeast quadrant in Lot 4 should be <br />dedicated for right-of-way to obtain a 275' radius of curve <br />for the roadway. This requirement should only be considered <br />for a variance if applicant agrees to post the road at a 25 <br />MPH limit. The issue of sight distance may be less <br />significant because most traffic leaving Outlet B will not <br />be turning left across traffic coming from the south, but <br />will be turning right. <br />i <br />* <br />\ <br />i