02-19-1991 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r Zoning File #1619 February 14, 1991 Page 10 4.The applicant should be required to provide a cul-de-sic or looped turnaround within the subdivision to provide for road maintenance and public safety vehicles. As an alternative, applicant should be required to provide a temporaiy or permanent cul-de-sac somewhere off the property for the same purposes. 5.The Planning Commission should determine whether continued use of the existing driveway for Lot 3 is acceptable, jLven that such approval would be a variance unless Lyirian Aienue is upgraded to City standards at the point where appliants' driveway enters the existing easement portions of l^an Avenue. 6.Applicants should be required to define a locatioi for driveway access to Lot 4. If that access is directly to Outlot B, then staff would recommend that Outlot B be upgraded to a 50' width with 100' diameter cul-de-sacw per the direction in Subdivision Code Section 11.33, Subdivision 4. 7.If any of the above recommendation or requirements result in the need to reconfigure the proposed plat drawings, thea the application should be tabled. If not, then the Plaming Commission sfould determine whether hardship exists to grant a variance to allow the 30' setback requestea fros the east lot line of Lot 1. Applicants should be requested to provide the folJming information: a) Pond drainage swale design for Lot 2, to prsfcect the proposed house location. ‘IS. b) Driveway design for Outlot B, indicating elevations and sections, indicating extent of development to be located outside of that outlot. The following would be recommended standard plat app»val conditions: a. Conservation and Flowage Easements for the major wetluids at the west and northeast ends of the plat shall be required. b. The standard drainage and utility easements shall be required within all lots of the plat. c. The plat will be subject to park dedication or park fees to be determined as required in Section 11.62. iL