Laserfiche WebLink
(2), Nays (3). <br />rage, 22' x 24' , <br />I approve a street <br />crease of 148 sf <br />a Ifl' setback and <br />\ the following <br />md available. <br />consistent with <br />Jaldur Park Road • <br />wing conditions: <br />1 Lo t 8. <br />irtnit for removal <br />ind 13. <br />d away from lake <br />i if soil boring3 <br />Lab. <br />he City will not <br />this property if <br />3 garage prior to <br />4ays (0) . <br />:h noted that the <br />3 response that <br />ition, which was <br />: their June 20, <br />ion of an unused <br />ed in the plat of <br />in applicants' <br />lowing findings: <br />>t meet current <br />PLANNING COMMISSION - CITY OF ORONO I8I9S3 <br />Re: Action Item 11 - variance for Milto.. ^ <br />From: Duane N. Hall, I860 Shady Wood, Orono <br />'(in <br />I object to an extension of the time granted Mr. Seifert for <br />removing the out-building which stands near the shore of Lake <br />ilinnetonka. I object in general and for specific reasons. <br />support the city’s efforts to remove structures built too close <br />frnm roadways. I’m convinced the 75 foot set-back <br />rom the lake is acceptable to Orono residents otherwise it would <br />have been repealed years ago. <br />More specifically, having lived next to an overcrowded lot a 60 <br />foot lot with four residential buildings, I can tell you it does <br />cause problems. In this situation one can expect annual damage to <br />adjacent property. For example, my fence is damaged annually by <br />ars sliding off Mr. Seifert’s driveway in winter. You can LpLt <br />four, sometimes more cars, parked in front. Since this type of <br />Seifert’s snowplower dumps <br />Th- ^ often burying my mailbox*^ <br />blockrtr hazardess since snow piled this highblocks the view of oncoming traffic. <br />Do not misunderstand me. I do not blame Mr. Seifert- in fact for <br />' s"ife?ra^5'b" events/'iradduLon'!^. Seifert and his family have been good neighbors and I <br />sincerely hope we can remain good neighbors. <br />stating during a Council meeting in <br />1980 that he would remove all three out-buildings immcdiately^if <br />Counci"felt I recall thecouncil felt that would not be necessary and proposed a phased <br />"nc'L’’ r„ ’''r. Seifert had' ec'lic <br />varla^c^fo ® ’’i®" ond the City granted the <br />his oart of iJ°r' ■'''■• Seifert has securedof rL ^ agreement I feel he should honor the City's partOf the agreement. ^ <br />^ know that Mr. Seifert's attorney called me <br />woul/mean^t'rJ^i?!- “ <br />and mostly, preferring to avoid causing the neighbors^any <br />additional problems connected with the overcroweded lot. <br />■ ■k ww