Laserfiche WebLink
3. Page 6 <br />igested was a good <br />ion make a motion <br />/e actions to the <br />)ice, and then the <br />lave to table the <br />ive the hobby shop <br />heated, and if the <br />be no heat and no <br />shop. <br />shore and street <br />increase of 148 sf <br />18 based on the <br />) • <br />\. <br />17 and 18 is minimi. <br />-20', giving the <br />ht on the road as <br />Llowing conditions: <br />1 permit for removal <br />remove garage. <br />:ted away from lake <br />mine if soil borings <br />g slab. <br />he City will not <br />this property if <br />m <br />of destroying the <br />on the same side of <br />er side) <br />e back farther than <br />iborhood then he has <br />he other side. <br />n Adams motion that <br />e house side of the <br />•d to decrease the <br />4-: <br />1^ <br />i/--y <br />3,® <br />.i <br />o':’» <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION .. . . . <br />- - ^ - <br />ROTH (CONT)iriAns stated that he would still suppor t the motion but <br />tharirwasn-this desire to add that. Adams noted his <br />that It aKrtiit it* 1 - He doesn*t want to maketwo concocns bdouc ic* x i • a . o <br />^^ei^!led4hr/thl^^^^:n1n^^CoUrssfo^n^h:d^4l•s^ <br />r^unrirreVstf '^^e^%'je"d^ t?:4t^?^ <br />ate^was so close to the water table anyway that a large <br />ITt of the rain that ^”so"l°ts^o'ne of <br />the plttF of the lake that he personally doesn't have a <br />lot of concern about that. <br />Goetten noted that the Baldur Park area Is highly <br />sensitive area and that whatever you can do to out down <br />on hardcover is important. <br />Adams amended his motion adding condition »6 that a <br />hatSlovet tradeoff be established using the gravel on <br />the north side of the road. <br />Sime seconded. <br />Adams stated that if the applicant mooses to "<ove the <br />garage towards the marsh, then he would have 5 - i® <br />additional driveway, then the gravel has t'J OO; <br />Ht; hrt rpad - offering applicant the possibility or <br />construction on other side of road meeting all the same <br />conditions. <br />vote: Ayes (2), Nays (3). Motion Failed. <br />McDonald, Callahan, and Goetten majority opinions. <br />Jr;,".’." s;; <br />secondly It had less Impact thermalnthirdly theres enough area on the lot with the m <br />house to accommodate the garage. No reason to put a <br />garage on the other side of the street without <br />pertinent structure. <br />Callahan moved to table Roth-s '’PPi'*"^1 ^^so Roth can meet with the Planning Commission and also <br />until the Planning Commission members that <br />members in 1982 to voice their views. <br />Callahan withdrew the motion to table and move to deny <br />it. <br />Callahan moved to table Roth's application until the <br />next Planning Commission meeting. <br />V 4- <br />* <br />I <br />^ • <br />4 <br />i i <br />V 'AH <br />^OTH (CONT) <br />#750 WAGENBR <br />PETITION FOR <br />STREET VACATI