Laserfiche WebLink
*• <br />Mas an existing <br />that time in 1982 <br />de of the street. <br />‘ very fragile to <br />:h would consider <br />e side. <br />on the other side <br />room on the house <br />by the direction <br />ng Commission but <br />ed that she still <br />in 1982. <br />he would put it on <br />srage on the main <br />variance? <br />cause of the 30' <br />tuation would be <br />is over where the <br />etlands as ifnow <br />ould be. <br />structure there <br />-iow, and it would <br />nything that is <br />n this location, <br />with another and <br />arage is a little <br />:ant has complied <br />of the Planning <br />pprove it, but to <br />' maybe moving the <br />would also invite <br />g a garage on the <br />way the Planning <br />e applicant the <br />^hat the Planning <br />time. <br />W <br />... <br />>1 ^ - j.'4i <br />% <br />lisp <br />mm. <br />iii <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 18, 1983. page 6 <br />ROTH (CONT) <br />offering all of these alternative actions to the <br />i^g^ r:i^ n:t‘=‘’ha^%^ - r t^^'hTe ^ti;: <br />application. <br />McDonald asked Mr. Fisk how extensive the <br />was, if the garage was going to be heated, and if the <br />garage would have plumbing? <br />Mr. Fisk stated that there would be no heat and no <br />plumbing and no room for a hobby shop. <br />following findings and hardships: <br />1. No additional land available. <br />2. Depth of dry area within lots 17 and 18 is minimi. <br />3. Setback of proposed garage 10*-20', giving the <br />owner the option of building right on the road as <br />proposed or setting garage back. <br />This approval subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Owner must obtain a demolition permit for removal <br />of existing garage and must remove garage. <br />2. All roof drainage to be directed away from lake <br />towards Baldur Park Road. <br />3. Building Official will determine if soil borings <br />are necessary for a floating slab. <br />4.Owner is placed on notice that the City will not <br />approve future improvements to this property if <br />they require variances. <br />5.Owner is offered the option of destroying the <br />existing garage and building on the same side of <br />the house, (building on either side) <br />6. If he chooses to set the garage back farther than <br />the other garages in the neighborhood then he has <br />to take away the gravel on the other side. <br />Sime seconded. <br />\ <br />Goetten felt it was important that in Adams motion that <br />if the garage was not placed on the house side of the <br />street that the gravel be removed to decrease the <br />hardcover on the house side. <br />-.-i <br />mm" <br />5 <br />U’V. <br />MSi <br />mmm <br />MINUTES OF * <br />ROTH (CONT)