Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1568 <br />July 11, 1990 <br />Page 3 <br />The applicants have recently acquired Lot 14. To staff's <br />knowledge, we are not aware if the applicant has applied for the <br />legal combination. If the City is to approve a conditional use <br />permit for the guest house unit, the applicant must apply for the <br />legal combination prior to the issuance of the building permit <br />for the conversion in order to meet the area requirements for an <br />independent guest house unit. As alreat’v ^oted above, if Lot 14 <br />was to be divided at some future from the homestead <br />property, the guest house unit would to be converted to an <br />approved accessory structure that shoul*.. ^*ot contain a dwelling <br />unit. This would also be a condition of the approval of a <br />conditional use permit. <br />Please review Exhibits E and F. The City has no knowledge <br />of the capacity of the exisitng septic system that serves the <br />current residence. Please note the tanks have not been pumped <br />since 1980. In April of this year the owner was advised once <br />again of the need to pump the system. If a second residential <br />unit is to be approved for this property, the owner has the <br />option to either use the present system to serve the proposed <br />guest house and to install a new conforming system to serve the <br />existing residence or to have a contractor confirm by uncovering <br />existing system for staff's visual inspection. Staff may then <br />determine if existing system is capable of serving both existing <br />house and guest house unit and what other improvements may be <br />necessary to serve both units. <br />Options of Action <br />Denial - If denied, please refer to Section 10.09, <br />Subdivision 6 for the necessary findings for denial of <br />conditional use permit and to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) <br />for the necessary findings for denial of the variances. <br />Approval - To approve a conditional use permit for a guest <br />house unit and existing setback variances as follows: <br />A. A variance to the required separation setback from one <br />principal structure to another approving a 58' setback <br />instead of the required 60' separation. <br />B. An existing 1' 6" setback from the north side lot line <br />(garage portion of structure) instead of the required 30' <br />setback. <br />C. An existing street setback of 49' 1“ instead of the <br />required 50' (setback from stable/barn structure) <br />D. Proposed side setback variance <br />A side setback for the proposed addition located 11+' <br />instead of the required 30'.