Laserfiche WebLink
'iiO rOL'T.'CIL IffiETIlIG HELD JANUARY 12, 1976 <br />’ following variances would require approval* <br />Aron - 54,450 eq. ft. <br />Lot v/idth - 25' <br />Side *ntback - 15' <br />Strf »ck - 33' <br />ho proposed location would however, meet the <br />5' lakeshore setback requirement. <br />ome conditions to be considered Jf?,. _ <br />ostrictlons to other forms of hardcover, filling <br />•nd grading, diversion of drainage <br />•.'raoval. Approval should not be .. <br />•ithout the condition of satisfactory percolation <br />•cats and on-site disposal design. <br />•'Tanning Coirnnlssion Meeting - December 3, 1975 <br />•ho commission recoiwnended approval of the <br />•^plication due to the hardship caused by tte <br />nnll size of the lot, because no adjoining <br />and was available and because the pro^rty was <br />•n single separate ownership provided the following <br />•onditions are met* <br />. Percolation toots meet approval of the <br />■. The building permit cite specific City <br />restrictions on building, grading and tree <br />removal and roust be 75' from the lakeshore. <br />In addition to the variances requested,a <br />23% variance on hardcover be allowed. <br />That the deck construction, as oho%m on the <br />plan, within 75' of the lakeshore, be <br />allowed provided it is of open typo, raised <br />construction with rock beneath and that no <br />concrete be used. <br />'Tanning Commission fleeting - January 5, 1976 <br />•''rry's Construction Company presented a <br />•nd drainage plan for the property. The plan <br />ncludcd swales in the front yard area to <br />*\vert drainage away from the lakes A retaining <br />•nil in the back lot area was included for the <br />v.rpose of diverting drainage across we road <br />nto a natural ponding area on the other side or <br />'in street, instead of it flowing into the <br />•lijacent low area of a neighboring property. The <br />•?n stated that 35 truck loads of fill would ^ <br />noded on the whole site of which 5 truck loads <br />' luld be needed within the 75' lakeshore setback <br />n order to make a 25' taper from the house, <br />hey also noted that there used to be five cabins <br />•*: the site and when they were taken down the <br />Ttural drainage was destroyed. The C •“•'ission <br />->lt t!iat the retaining wall could be •. naans <br />' blocking a natural ponding area. <br />(Continued) <br />Pago 7 <br />VARIANCE <br />1055 Nest Perndale Road <br />(Continued)